Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30523
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorInglis, Gabrielle-
dc.contributor.authorShire, Aisha-
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T17:37:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-01T17:37:19Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30523-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Language barriers in healthcare present significant challenges, leading to miscommunication, increased errors, and decreased quality of care. The introduction of a professional language interpretation service (LIS) at McMaster Family Practice (MFP) in Hamilton aims to address these issues. This study explores how physicians use LIS, the challenges they face, their teaching and learning practices, and the role of health advocacy for patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). Aim: This study aims to understand the experiences of physicians and residents using LIS in primary care, identify barriers to effective use, and provide recommendations for clinical, educational, and policy improvements. Additionally, the study examines how health advocacy can be leveraged to improve care for patients with LEP. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews with 14 participants, including staff physicians and residents at MFP. Data was analyzed using directed content analysis to identify key themes and patterns in LIS use and perceptions. Findings: Participants reported using various LIS, with family members and Google Translate being the most common. They used these services to collect patient information, communicate diagnoses and health information, and engage in health promotion and disease prevention. Significant barriers identified included time constraints, organizational challenges, and others. Many contextual factors influenced providers perception and use of LIS, such as race and power dynamics. Providers demonstrated health advocacy actions at the individual level, but not at the community or systems level. The theme of ‘getting by’ was prevalent in this study, where participants decided to continue a visit without appropriate LIS, even when necessary. Conclusions: The study highlights the need for better integrating LIS in clinical practice through organizational support and targeted educational interventions. Addressing these barriers can enhance the quality of care for patients with language barriers and support health advocacy efforts within the primary care setting.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectlanguage interpretationen_US
dc.subjectinterpreteren_US
dc.subjectfamily medicineen_US
dc.subjectfamily physicianen_US
dc.subjectresidenten_US
dc.subjectlanguage barrieren_US
dc.subjectprimary careen_US
dc.subjectcommunicationen_US
dc.subjectlimited English proficiencyen_US
dc.subjectpatient careen_US
dc.subjectmedicineen_US
dc.subjectmedical educationen_US
dc.subjectGoogle Translateen_US
dc.subjectad hoc interpretationen_US
dc.titleEnhancing Communication and Advocacy in Primary Careen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Qualitative Descriptive Study on the Use of Language Interpretation Services Among Physicians and Residentsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Science Educationen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractLanguage barriers in healthcare can lead to miscommunication, increased errors, and lower quality of care. This study investigates how physicians use language interpretation services (LIS), their challenges, the factors influencing their beliefs and the educational implications. It also explores how physicians advocate for patients who do not speak English. The study aims to understand the experiences of physicians and residents using LIS in primary care, identify barriers, and offer recommendations for clinical, educational, and policy improvements. The study used interviews with 14 doctors and residents and found that informal LIS are commonly used, due to barriers to its use, such as time constraints and organizational challenges. The study also found that providers were not fully advocating for patients who do not speak English. The findings highlight the need for better integrating LIS through organizational support and targeted education to improve care for patients with limited English proficiency and enhance health advocacy.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
shire_aisha_a_202408_healthscienceeducation.pdf
Open Access
866.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue