Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30383
Title: Substance Use and the Potential Impact on the Psychostimulant Response in Adult ADHD
Authors: Romero, Giovana
Advisor: Van Ameringen, Michael
Department: Health Sciences
Keywords: Cannabis;Substance Use Disorder;ADHD;Treatment
Publication Date: 21-Nov-2024
Abstract: Background: Attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder presenting with three core symptoms: inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. The ADHD population is 3 times more susceptible to developing a cannabis use disorder compared to the general population. Psychostimulants are the first-line treatment for ADHD. There is currently no literature on the impact of cannabis on the psychostimulant response. Objectives: To compare the response to psychostimulant treatment in adults with ADHD between cannabis and non-cannabis users Methods: Sixty-five participants with a primary diagnosis of ADHD were recruited from the MacAnxiety Research Clinic and St. Joseph's Psychiatric Community Clinic. Participants were assigned to the cannabis, or non-cannabis group based on their cannabis status at baseline. The study was 8 weeks long and included 3 visits. The first visit of the study was called “Baseline” and would occur prior to the start of stimulant medication. Participants would be seen at two additional time points 4- and 8-weeks post-baseline visit at which point they would be taking their stimulant medication. At each study visit all participants would fill out the self-reported assessment battery conducted through REDCap. The study psychiatrist would assign a CGI-S score at the end of each visit and a CGI-I score at the end of week 4 and week 8. Results: Cannabis and non-cannabis users did not differ statistically in their BAARS-IV, CGI-S, and CGI-I scores over the study. Secondary outcomes investigating CUD, stimulant type, stimulant dosage, comorbidities, and responder rate did not produce significant outcomes. Conclusions: There was no difference in the treatment response to psychostimulants in adults with ADHD between cannabis and non-cannabis users. Further studies should continue exploring treatment response in populations with co-occurring adult ADHD and cannabis use.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30383
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Romero_Giovana_finalsubmission2024september_MSc.pdf
Open Access
1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue