Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorService, Elisabet-
dc.contributor.authorFreiburger, Troy-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T18:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-04T18:06:09Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30353-
dc.description.abstractThe ability to represent time is essential for many aspects of human cognition and is especially critical for how people structure language and speech. Concerning language, people’s ability to represent time relates to prosody (particularly, to the rhythmic aspects of language). Past research has shown a robust connection between people’s rhythmic ability and their language skills; however, the nature of this relationship remains unclear. This unclarity, at least in part, results from the multidimensionality of people’s rhythmic ability. The composite nature of rhythmic ability is evident from the broad variety of different rhythmic tasks that are found in the literature as well as the interindividual variation in people’s performance on them. In order to clarify which aspects of people’s rhythmic ability are related to language skills, in the present study a number of different rhythm tasks as well as a short-term memory task for non-sense sentences were administered. Participants' performance on the various rhythm tasks was used to predict performance on the non-sense sentence repetition task. It was found that the tapping memory task (but none of the various rhythmic production or perception tasks) was able to predict people’s performance on the non-sense repetition task. In this task, participants were asked to tap from memory a sequence of auditorily presented short or long tones. The task showed a variable ability to predict performance depending on the size of the language units that were analyzed. Prediction was better for those units of language that included more rhythmic and temporal information. These findings suggest that the tapping memory task is distinct from the other rhythmic tasks administered in the present study (which either assessed people’s ability to produce or perceive rhythms), and that the tapping memory task assesses a different rhythmical ability – which is here referred to as auditory sequential memory.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Science of Languageen_US
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.subjectRhythmic Abilityen_US
dc.subjectTemporal Representationen_US
dc.subjectMemoryen_US
dc.subjectRhythm Tasksen_US
dc.subjectRhythm Perceptionen_US
dc.subjectRhythm Productionen_US
dc.titleUnpacking the Relationship Between Temporal Structures and Language: An Examination of How Various Rhythmic Tasks Relate to Language Skillsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCognitive Science of Languageen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractWhile rhythm is most commonly associated with music, it is also important to our use of language. Rhythm is a complex phenomenon that involves a number of different cognitive processes and abilities. The most obvious of these are the ability to perceive and produce rhythm, and prior research has shown that these abilities vary both in and across individuals. People’s capacity for remembering rhythms is another important aspect of people’s rhythmical ability. However, it is unclear which aspects of rhythm are the most important to language. This experiment administered a number of different rhythmic tasks in order to determine which aspects of rhythm were most related to language. It was found that people’s ability to remember rhythms was the greatest predictor of their ability to remember language-like sentence stimuli.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Freiburger_Troy_A_2024August_MSc.pdf
Open Access
698.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue