Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30307
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Devereaux, PJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Lily | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-02T15:38:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-02T15:38:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30307 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The contemporary causes of perioperative mortality in general surgery is not well described. It is likely that major bleeding is underestimated in current literature, which may have contributed to the lack of progress made in reducing perioperative bleeding in general surgery. Existing noncardiac surgery data has been instrumental in the identification of common post-operative complications and evaluating promising interventions to address them. However, context-specific evidence is required for uptake of research findings into clinical practice. The present work distilled the existing noncardiac surgery data to focus on the field of general surgery. In doing so, we identified perioperative bleeding to be a common complication in general surgery and attempted to address this issue. Chapter 1 provides the background information and scientific framework that lay the foundation and justification for conducting the studies included in this work. Chapter 2 presents the results of a large international prospective cohort study describing the epidemiology of post-operative complications in a cohort of contemporary general surgery patients and identify the complications associated with 30-day mortality. Chapter 3 presents a study that was conducted with similar methodology as Chapter 2 but in the population of orthopedic surgery patients. The differences in the results as compared to the general surgery cohort highlights the importance of specialty-specific data to supplement noncardiac surgery data. Chapter 4 presents the results of the PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-3 (POISE-3) trial substudy to provide general surgery specific evidence on the safety and efficacy of prophylactic TXA to reduce perioperative bleeding. Chapter 5 summarizes the major findings of the thesis work and offer areas for future research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Identifying and Addressing the Problem of Perioperative Bleeding in General Surgery: A Multi-Methods Approach | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Health Research Methodology | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
dc.description.layabstract | Every surgery carries the risk of unfavourable outcomes that could lead to worse quality of life or in severe cases, death. It is important to understand the factors that are associated with death to know where to best direct future research and resources. In the first two parts of this work, we identify the most common unfavourable outcomes that happen after general surgery and orthopedic surgery and explore which ones can lead to death. By conducting the same study on two different surgery populations, we demonstrate that different surgical fields may have differing areas of focus to improve outcomes after surgery. Upon identifying major bleeding to be the largest contributor for death in the general surgery cohort, the last part of the thesis looked at the use of a medication called tranexamic acid to safely reduce the risk of bleeding among general surgery patients. | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Park_Lily_J_2024Jun_MSc.pdf | 1.28 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.