Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30276
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorTan, Netina-
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Garima-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-01T14:30:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-01T14:30:28Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30276-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the internal party dynamics of two major parties in India that contribute to the persistent underrepresentation of women in Indian national politics. I compare and investigate the processes and informal practices of candidate selection in two major parties: Indian National Congress (INC) and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP). Based on original candidate data and semi-structured elite interviews, I examine the factors that constrained women's nominations in the national elections held in India between 2004 and 2019. Drawing on mixed-methods research, I find that centralized formal selectorates and selection methods limit opportunities for women, alongside the marginalization of subsidiary women’s organizations by both parties, thereby constraining women’s candidacy. Despite ideological differences, both the parties reinforce underlying patriarchal norms by limiting the role of subsidiary women's organizations from the candidate selection processes. The underrepresentation of women in the formal selectorate restricts their ability to shape nominations and curtail opportunities for women candidates for both general and reserved seats in the national elections. My findings show that underlying gender biases among party elites, who prioritize informal traits that reinforce existing power structures in parties and marginalize women who do not fit these criteria. For general seats, both the parties tend to prefer women candidates who have wealth, dynastic connections, criminal cases, and higher education. As for the reserved seats, the INC tend to favor wealthy, dynastic, and highly-educated women candidates, while the BJP tend to prefer women candidates with wealth, criminal cases, and higher-education. This dissertation reveals differing nomination patterns between the INC and BJP and distinct ideological stances in the less politically competitive reserved seats. The INC nominated more women candidates in reserved seats in the 2004 and 2019 elections, aligning with its inclusive ideology. Conversely, the BJP has not with its more traditional right-wing nationalist values. Overall, this dissertation finds that both candidate selection methods and informal party practices perpetuate gender disparities in political representation in India. By examining the opaque candidate selection processes through a gendered lens, this dissertation sheds light on the barriers women face for electoral candidacy in Indian national politics.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectcandidate selection, party politics, gender politics, informal party politics, Indiaen_US
dc.titleBARRIERS TO WOMEN IN POLITICS: CANDIDATE SELECTION AND INFORMAL PARTY POLITICS IN INDIAen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeDissertationen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis dissertation investigates the inner workings of the two major political parties in India, i.e. the Indian National Congress (INC) and the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) that contribute to the lack of women in Indian national politics. Drawing on mixed-methods research involving empirical data analysis of original candidate data and semi-structured elite interviews, I examine candidate selection within the two major Indian parties for national elections held between 2004 and 2019. I find that both the parties’ centralized, and male-dominated selection processes marginalize the subsidiary women’s organizations within them, limiting women’s influence on nominations during national elections. For general seats, both the parties tend to prefer women candidates with wealth, dynastic ties, criminal cases, and higher-education. In the reserved seats, the INC tend to favor wealthy, dynastic, and highly-educated women candidates, while the BJP tend to prefer women with wealth, criminal cases, and higher-education. The INC’s inclusive ideology led to more women candidates in the less politically competitive reserved seats in the national elections of 2004 and 2019, unlike the BJP’s traditionalist approach. Overall, my findings reveal that both candidate selection methods and informal practices within parties result in creating barriers for women’s electoral candidacy in Indian national politics.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sarkar_Garima_Finalsubmission2024September_PhD.pdf
Embargoed until: 2025-09-26
1.93 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue