Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/30187
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMacedo, Luciana-
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Lee-Ran-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T20:13:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-11T20:13:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/30187-
dc.description.abstractA significant driver of pain in low back pain (LBP) is alteration to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). EPM can be measured using quantitative sensory tests (QST), which provides important information on nociceptive pathways. Exercise therapy is recommended as the first line of care for LBP; however, there is limited information on the mechanisms of action that lead to symptom improvements. The first manuscript was a scoping review that summarized protocols used to assess EPM using QST such as pain pressure threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS), conditioned pain modulation (CPM) or exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) in LBP. Scientific databases were searched for articles that used QST or EIH protocols in LBP. In total, 193 studies were included in this review: 172 used PPT, 54 used TS and 53 used CPM and 5 investigated EIH. There was high variability in the type of equipment, timing, trials, and testing location with many studies not reporting this information. The results demonstrate a need for standardized protocols and reporting guidelines as well as further research to aid in selecting the most appropriate QST parameters for different clinical presentations. The second manuscript was a pilot study that assessed the feasibility of a protocol investigating if changes in EPM occur after exercise therapy. Participants were recruited through a larger trial (WELBack) and were randomized to receive one of two exercise therapies. Participants attended two testing sessions (before and after an 8-week treatment) consisting of PPT, TS, CPM and EIH. Thirty-six participants were recruited and completed baseline assessments. In total, 32 (88.9%) participants completed the follow-up assessment. The results demonstrated that the protocol was feasible. Improvements to patient reported outcomes were seen, but not to all EPM measures. Future work should consider changes to the CPM protocol, and a fully powered study to investigate EPM changes after exercise therapy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEndogenous Pain Modulationen_US
dc.subjectLow Back Painen_US
dc.subjectExercise Therapyen_US
dc.subjectQuantitative Sensory Testingen_US
dc.subjectExercise Induced Hypoalgesiaen_US
dc.titleEndogenous Pain Modulation in Low Back Painen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Health Sciences (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractLow back pain (LBP) may occur because of changes in our nervous system, rather than a physical injury. However, there is no previous research on if exercise can improve these changes. The purpose of this thesis was to develop and test a protocol to assess how the body processes pain, and if this can change after exercise. We summarized past research on how four tests to assess pain processing have been performed. The results showed many differences in how these tests were performed and reported. More consistency and guidelines are needed to improve how these tests are conducted. Next, we conducted a study aimed to assess the feasibility of a protocol to see if changes occur in how the body processes pain after an exercise therapy program. The results of this study showed the protocol was feasible, and trends in improvement on some but not all measures.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goodman_Lee-Ran_2024August_MScRehabilitationScience.pdf
Embargoed until: 2025-08-16
1.83 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue