Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29910
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Abelson, Julia | - |
dc.contributor.author | You, Jeonghwa | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-27T19:30:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-27T19:30:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29910 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Public engagement has become a popular tool in modern policymaking, with its recognized benefits including developing better-informed policies, building trust, and tackling health inequities. Considering that older adults are one of the largest user groups of healthcare services and present diverse and complex health needs, public engagement could significantly benefit health policymaking for this demographic. However, despite the multitude of factors influencing the success of public engagement in realizing its intended benefits, limited research exists on the landscape and influencing factors of public engagement in this sector. This thesis aims to enhance our understanding of these elements. First, a scoping review of both peer-reviewed and grey literature is conducted to describe the characteristics and impacts of engagement initiatives in health policymaking for older adults. It explores the landscape of public engagement practices and provides recommendations to foster older adults’ contribution to health policymaking designed for them. Second, a comparative case study explains the interplay between political environments, public input gathered from engagement initiatives, and policy outcomes in two long-term care policymaking cases in Canada. Our findings reveal the interconnection between institutional factors, stakeholder interests, ideas, and external factors that shaped the policy outcomes, which did not incorporate the key input expressed through public engagement initiatives. Finally, an interpretive description study examines the perspectives of long-term care residents and their families in Ontario regarding legitimate representatives for their interests in long-term care policymaking. Participants identify core characteristics of intermediary agents deemed legitimate representatives, emphasizing the importance of mirroring the identity of, or having experience as, long-term care residents or family members. Taken together, these studies underscore the importance of a holistic approach to public engagement, incorporating thoughtful design elements and considering broader political contexts surrounding policymaking, in order for public engagement to deliver its intended benefits. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.title | Public engagement in health policymaking for older adults | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Health Policy | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
you_jeonghwa_finalsubmission2024june_phd.pdf | 1.86 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.