Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29886
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVanstone, Meredith-
dc.contributor.authorCernat, Alexandra-
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-24T17:48:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-06-24T17:48:20Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/29886-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is commonly treated with antidepressants, but many patients undergo trial-and-error to find the medication best suited for them. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing was developed to provide prescribing guidance for a variety of medications including antidepressants. PGx testing is not yet part of standard depression care in Canada, but clinical implementation efforts are ongoing. Patient perspectives, as well as the views of people with professional expertise about this technology, are critical to health technology assessment (HTA) and policy decisions, and can inform implementation. Methods: This dissertation produces actionable patient and key informant (i.e., clinician, scientists, policy actor, industry member) perspectives evidence for future HTA and policy- making through three independent studies: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of patient experiences of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), and two qualitative description studies about patient and key informant perspectives on PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing. Results: Trial-and-error of medications often leaves patients feeling hopeless but desperate to get better. Patients and key informants both felt the main benefit of PGx testing is its potential to reduce the time between diagnosis and successful treatment. The main findings of this research were concrete suggestions for how PGx testing may be integrated in the health system. Participants preferred this technology be deployed in primary care, with patients with TRD identified as a possible priority population. The ideal PGx test would incorporate genetic variants common in non-white populations to ensure equity of health outcomes, and mechanisms to facilitate equity of access (eg., public funding) were considered important. Conclusions: Patients and key informants both described benefits of PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing. Patients typically raised more concerns than key informants. Future research is needed around some of the ethical and social issues related to PGx testing, as well as to address feasibility questions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectHealth policyen_US
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_US
dc.subjectPharmacogenomicsen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectEthical, legal, social issuesen_US
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.titleConsiderations for the implementation of pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing to guide antidepressant prescribing in primary care in Ontario, Canadaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeDissertationen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractPharmacogenomic (PGx) testing may facilitate targeted prescribing of antidepressants by identifying genetic factors that play a role in how a person responds to these drugs. However, this technology is not yet widely or systematically used in clinical care. This dissertation focuses on how PGx testing might be implemented in primary care in Ontario, Canada. It examines which patients this type of genetic testing may be most appropriate for, and collects and analyzes the views of patients with depression and experts on PGx testing about this technology. The main benefit of PGx testing was its potential to help people get better faster, and primary care was uniformly considered an appropriate care setting for the use of this technology. There were some concerns that people may not fully understand the limitations of PGx testing. Future research is needed to understand how this technology might fit into clinician workflows across the healthcare system.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cernat_Alexandra_06-2024_Health Policy PhD.pdf
Open Access
6.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue