Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/29060
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKuperman, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorAltman, Emilie-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-15T19:57:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-15T19:57:32Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/29060-
dc.description.abstractWe performed quantitative analysis on transcriptions of 784 interviews with Holocaust survivors. The interviews were collected by the University of Southern California Shoah Foundation, and the first 15 minutes of each interview had been transcribed using automatic speech recognition. The survivors were an aging population as the interviews were conducted around fifty years after the end of the Holocaust. We used statistical methods and algorithms to analyze the data including keyness analysis, topic modeling, and emotionality analysis. We used the Contemporary Corpus of American English (COCA) as a comparative corpus for these analyses. Overall, we found that survivors prioritized themes of the Holocaust and their families in the interviews. Specific words and themes reoccurred across the corpus demonstrating a collective and consistent memory of trauma. Our emotionality analyses revealed that survivors used slightly more positive language and fewer words relating to anger, disgust, and fear than the speakers in our comparative corpus.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectTraumaen_US
dc.subjectHolocausten_US
dc.subjectLinguisticsen_US
dc.subjectCorpus Analysisen_US
dc.titleThe Language of Trauma: A Linguistic Analysis of Interviews with Holocaust Survivorsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCognitive Science of Languageen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractFor this thesis, we analyzed 784 transcribed interviews with Holocaust survivors. The interviews were conducted by the Shoah Foundation and took place from 1994-2000; around 50 years after the end of World War II. We compared the language in the interviews to the spoken component of a large corpus (collection of texts) called The Contemporary Corpus of American English (COCA). In our analyses, we found the words that are most representative of the survivors' language across the corpus. We also found topics that were discussed most frequently in the interviews. Words and topics relating to family, Judaism, and experiences of the Holocaust were the most common. We also analyzed the emotionality of the survivors' language and found that overall, they used slightly more positive words than the words in COCA. They also used fewer words associated with the emotions anger, fear, and disgust.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
altman_emilie_09-2023_MSc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2024-09-22
471.11 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue