Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/28891
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLatulippe, David-
dc.contributor.authorMcClure, Matthew-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-14T19:13:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-14T19:13:37Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/28891-
dc.description.abstractBiogas is becoming a more important source of green, renewable energy however, its production results in a liquid wastewater, known as centrate, which must be treated due to its high levels of total dissolved solids (TDS), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Currently, biogas generation facilities treat centrate using a combination of biological and physical treatments (via a membrane bioreactor (MBR)), which produces a stream known as MBR permeate. While MBR permeate achieves improved quality, MBR usage has several challenges including difficulty of scaling biological processes, and handling capacity limitations. In this study, membrane only treatment of centrate, collected from an operating biogas generation facility, was investigated to determine if similar quality permeates could be obtained without any biological treatments. Single- stage treatment of centrate using either polymeric or ceramic nanofiltration membranes with molecular weight cut offs between 400 and 800 Da, produced a permeate similar to MBR permeate. These membrane types caused average COD rejections of 92% and 90% respectively. However, the permeates from the nanofiltration membranes had very high levels of ammonia, which was not present in the MBR permeate. The ceramic nanofiltration membranes can achieve higher permeate fluxes than the polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Both membrane types experienced significant fouling which was removed using cleaning procedures. Two-stage treatment of centrate using ceramic nanofiltration membranes followed by polymeric reverse osmosis membranes further improved the quality of permeate and achieved COD rejections of 99% overall. While the reverse osmosis membranes did remove some ammonia, the levels were still higher than what was seen in the MBR permeate. The two-stage treatment of centrate can provide the permeate which is closest to the MBR permeate however, further studies are required to address the higher ammonia concentration values. The research shows that only using membranes is a potential treatment pathway for real centrate samples.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectNanofiltration Membranesen_US
dc.subjectBiogasen_US
dc.subjectCeramic Membranesen_US
dc.subjectPolymeric Membranesen_US
dc.subjectCentrateen_US
dc.subjectDigestateen_US
dc.subjectWastewater Filtrationen_US
dc.titleALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER FROM A BIOGAS GENERATION FACILITY USING MEMBRANESen_US
dc.title.alternativeALTERNATIVE TREATMENT OF WASTEWATER FROM A BIOGAS GENERATION FACILITY USING MEMBRANES – A COMPARISON BETWEEN POLYMERIC AND CERAMIC NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANESen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Applied Science (MASc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThe production of biogas, which is a green, renewable energy source results in a liquid wastewater known as centrate. This wastewater is very dirty and complex and requires treatment as it cannot be dumped and disposed of in its current state. Current treatment methods for centrate use combinations of biological treatment and filtration processes, which has its own challenges due to the complexity of biological treatments. An alternative treatment method for the centrate is nanofiltration membranes which offer the ability to treat large volumes of centrate wastewater without the complexity of relying on biological treatment options. Four different nanofiltration membranes, including two polymeric and two ceramic membranes, were used to treat real industrial wastewater samples of centrate collected from a biogas generation facility. Both types of nanofiltration membranes provided similar quality permeate to the current treatment method of centrate, which uses a combination of biological and physical treatment methods.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McClure_Matthew_D_2023Aug_MASc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2024-08-10
8.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue