Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/28304
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAbdul Razak-
dc.contributor.authorOmar Ibrahim, Alhaidari-
dc.contributor.authorJaved Ahmed-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-06T04:51:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-06T04:51:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.citationRazak, Abdul, Alhaidari, Omar Ibrahim and Ahmed, Javed. "Interventions for reducing late-onset sepsis in neonates: an umbrella review" Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0131en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2022-0131-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/28304-
dc.description.abstractObjectives Neonatal sepsis is one of the leading causes of neonatal deaths in neonatal intensive care units. Hence, it is essential to review the evidence from systematic reviews on interventions for reducing late-onset sepsis (LOS) in neonates. Methods PubMed and the Cochrane Central were searched from inception through August 2020 without any language restriction. Cochrane reviews of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing any intervention in the neonatal period and including one or more RCTs reporting LOS. Two authors independently performed screening, data extraction, assessed the quality of evidence using Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, and assessed the quality of reviews using a measurement tool to assess of multiple systematic reviews 2 tool. Results A total of 101 high-quality Cochrane reviews involving 612 RCTs and 193,713 neonates, evaluating 141 interventions were included. High-quality evidence showed a reduction in any or culture-proven LOS using antibiotic lock therapy for neonates with central venous catheters (CVC). Moderate-quality evidence showed a decrease in any LOS with antibiotic prophylaxis or vancomycin prophylaxis for neonates with CVC, chlorhexidine for skin or cord care, and kangaroo care for low birth weight babies. Similarly, moderate-quality evidence showed reduced culture-proven LOS with intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis for preterm infants and probiotic supplementation for very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Lastly, moderate-quality evidence showed a reduction in fungal LOS with the use of systemic antifungal prophylaxis in VLBW infants. Conclusions The overview summarizes the evidence from the Cochrane reviews assessing interventions for reducing LOS in neonates, and can be utilized by clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and consumers for decision-making and translating evidence into clinical practice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Perinatal Medicineen_US
dc.subjectLate onset sepsis, Neonates ,Overviewen_US
dc.titleInterventions for reducing late-onset sepsis in neonates: an umbrella reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMedicineen_US
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
10.1515_jpm-2022-0131.pdf
Open Access
659.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue