Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/28270
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLavis, John N.-
dc.contributor.authorAli, Ahmednur-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-28T21:45:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-28T21:45:11Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/28270-
dc.description.abstractClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide recommendations based on the best available evidence to ensure that decisions about patient care are well-informed. Extensive research within implementation science has highlighted the factors and strategies that are most important in CPG implementation across a variety of settings. The uptake of evidence-based practice however, is quite complex, and there still exist gaps in knowledge about how those factors and strategies are affected by the policy context. In particular, we know little about how considerations about the role of policy, politics, and health systems affect whether and how CPGs are used. The objective of this dissertation is to advance the use of policy, political, and health systems considerations in the implementation of CPGs through three original scientific contributions. First, a critical interpretive synthesis of existing literature was used to enrich two existing implementation frameworks (the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) from a policy context perspective. Second, a multiple explanatory case study of guideline implementation processes was used to investigate how the enriched frameworks could be used to identify policy context-related factors and strategies needed to support CPG implementation. Third, a formative evaluation study design was utilized to explore how to improve upon and support the use of these enriched frameworks from the perspective of expert guideline developers and guideline implementers across the six World Health Organization regions. Collectively, these studies contribute theoretical, substantive, and methodological insights toward understanding the policy context relevant factors and strategies that support effective implementation of CPGs. A better understanding of the policy, political, and health systems considerations that impact CPG implementation can translate into more fit-for-purpose CPGs being developed and more tailored implementation strategies being employed, as well as more patients benefiting from clinical care informed by the best available evidence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.subjectClinical Practice Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectImplementation scienceen_US
dc.titleHow does policy support guideline implementation? The role of policy, political, and health systems considerations in clinical practice guideline implementationen_US
dc.title.alternativePolicy support in guideline implementationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Policyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractClinical practice guidelines (CPGs) help guide clinicians incorporate into their existing practice the best ways to treat patients, and they do so by providing recommendations based on the best available research evidence. There is research evidence about what factors are important and what approaches are effective in making sure CPGs are used, but there is a lack of understanding about how those factors and strategies are affected by the policy context. This thesis answers questions about the role of the policy context in CPG implementation to help fill this gap. It accomplishes this in three ways: 1) it enriches two existing implementation frameworks with policy context considerations; 2) it explores how these enriched frameworks could have helped with two past implementation efforts; and 3) it provides insights from guideline experts about how to improve upon and support the use of these enriched frameworks.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ali_Ahmednur_202212_HealthPolicyPhD.pdf
Open Access
1.57 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue