Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27983
Title: Preparedness for Clinical Trials in Medical Oncology Subspecialty Training in Canada - A National, Bi-Lingual Questionnaire
Authors: Febbraro, Michela
Advisor: Pond, Gregory
Department: Health Research Methodology
Keywords: Education;CBME;Medical Education;Medicine;Residency;Medical Oncology
Publication Date: 2022
Abstract: Background: There is no standardized approach to clinical trial education for Canadian medical oncology subspecialty training. Canadian medical oncology subspecialty training programs have transitioned to a competency by design (CBD) educational framework. This study aims to determine whether current education practices in medical oncology subspecialty training programs in Canada prepare medical oncology trainees for participating in clinical trials as an investigator. Methods: A national, online, bi-lingual questionnaire to understand exposure to clinical trials and general research in training, self-perceived competence, preparedness, and willingness to participate in clinical trials was conducted. Participants included medical oncology resident trainees and fellow trainees and new-to-practice physicians who have practiced in medical oncology for less than 5 years. All participants had to complete a medical oncology subspecialty training program in Canada. Data were collected from November 2021 to February 2022. Results are presented using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of the 41 respondents (response rate: 15%), most were new physicians (41%), from Ontario (61%). 73% did not have formal training on how to participate in clinical trials as an investigator. 65% rated their competence in clinical trials as fair/poor and 74% rated their preparedness for clinical trials as fair/poor after training. 79% were willing to participate as an investigator in clinical trials after training. A correlation analysis revealed structured or in-clinic teaching in clinical trials trended towards improved self-evaluations of competence, preparedness, and willingness to participate in clinical trials (p > 0.05). Most respondents (56%) sought additional clinical trial education after training. Conclusion: Training in clinical trials is highly variable. After training, most trainees do not feel competent or prepared to participate in clinical trials as an investigator, but they have a willingness to pursue clinical trials. Further assessment into how to produce competent medical oncology clinical trial investigators is warranted.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27983
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
HRM Thesis - M.Febbraro - 001368256.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2023-09-21
628.84 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue