Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMilliken, Bruce-
dc.contributor.authorCerisano, Stefania-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-29T18:00:04Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-29T18:00:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/27770-
dc.description.abstractThe concept of attention is complex and multifaceted and can be approached from many perspectives. One such perspective is of attention as a limited pool of resources. Kahneman’s (1973) model of limited capacity provides a basis for understanding constraints on attention, including the costs of divided attention. In the same vein as Kahneman’s model, the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL; Pichora-Fuller et al., 2016) applies the concept of limited attentional capacity to the demands of listening in a variety of contexts. The current work examines novel combinations of the methods commonly used in the field of Cognitive Hearing Science to address questions about the nature of attention allocation when listening in noise and under the constraints of divided attention. I first combined listening in noise with a secondary continuous working memory task and measured pupillary response as an index of cognitive work and listening effort. Here, I found that listening task demands affect performance on the working memory task. The shared demands of listening and working memory were not, however, evident in the pupil dilation patterns. As a result, I followed these findings by employing a different divided attention method. With the use of a temporally discrete secondary task that either closely overlapped with the listening task or did not closely overlap, I found the same carryover effects of listening demands on secondary task. Most importantly, I found that these demands interacted and were clearly present in the pupil dilation patterns, demonstrating the importance of the timing of the task demands. Together, the studies in this thesis provide evidence that these two secondary tasks access the same attentional resources as those accessed in the primary listening task and that this overlapping demand for resources can be seen in the pupillary response.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectListening in Noiseen_US
dc.subjectDivided Attentionen_US
dc.subjectAttention Allocationen_US
dc.subjectPupil Dilationen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Efforten_US
dc.titleListening in Noise and Divided Attentionen_US
dc.title.alternativeCombining Listening in Noise and Divided Attention with Pupillary Response to Explore Attentional Resource Useen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractListening to speech in a noisy environment is a cognitively difficult and effortful task. Attending to more than one task at a time is similarly demanding and effortful. These two kinds of tasks are assumed to use the same limited pool of cognitive resources that we have available to us. This thesis combines listening in noise with divided attention tasks to demonstrate this overlap in demands for cognitive resources using novel combinations of these kinds of tasks. Additionally, this thesis uses the pupillary response—a well-studied index of cognitive effort—to further examine the nature of these overlapping task demands. These studies found that the demands of these tasks do, in fact, overlap, and contribute evidence to the current literature supporting the underlying assumption that these two tasks, and the pupillary response as a measure of effort, are accessing the same pool of limited resources.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cerisano_Stefania_2022August_PhD.pdf
Open Access
2.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue