Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27621
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMcneill, Fiona-
dc.contributor.advisorChettle, David-
dc.contributor.advisorChambers, Douglas-
dc.contributor.authorDas, Ryan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T19:38:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-13T19:38:42Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/27621-
dc.description.abstractThe commission on radiological protection through publication 118 decided to recommend a change to the eye dose limit in 2011. ICRP recommendations made in publications, especially ‘publication 60’ and its subsequent update ‘publication 103’ has served as standards for regulatory authorities worldwide in limiting ionizing radiation exposure both to workers and members of the public. For example in Canada, the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) generally directly adopts recommendations from ICRP. The previous dose limit for the lens of the eye was 150 mSv year-1, based on Publication 60 and 103. Regulatory agencies worldwide have been using this value and subsequently nuclear facilities, hospitals and universities have designed their radiation protection program based on this dose limit for several decades. The new revised eye dose limit now being equivalent to the whole body dose limit will pose significant challenges for sectors where the eye exposure was not characterized as the limit was previously five times over the whole body exposure. A two-step approach was used in conducting this study, firstly a through literature search was conducted on the effects of ionizing radiation to the eye, its radiobiology, fundamentals in established both dose limits was analyzed. Secondly, the authors spent time researching institutions that use ionizing radiation and interviewed engineers, medical physicists, radiation safety officers and regulators from a wide array of fields and industries. Based on the ICRP publications, the review of the literature and the interviews conducted with the nuclear industry, there is consensus in Canada and among IAEA member states that the dose limit for the lens of the eye should be reduced from the original proposed limit of 150 mSv per year. However not to the recommendations suggested by ICRP 118, but, to a standard reasonable and an achievable limit that is 50 mSv per year.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectIonizing Radiationen_US
dc.subjectLens Opacitiesen_US
dc.subjectCataractogenesisen_US
dc.subjectICRPen_US
dc.subjectRadiation Cataractsen_US
dc.subjectLens of the Eyeen_US
dc.subjectVision Impairmenten_US
dc.subjectCataractsen_US
dc.subjectRadiationen_US
dc.subjectMedical Physicsen_US
dc.titleDose Limit Changes to the Lens of the Eye & Its Regulatory Implicationsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Physicsen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThe International Commission on Radiological Protection (“ICRP”), the independent governing body responsible for radiation protection, since the early 1950s has been issuing recommendations that are widely used as radiological protection standards by regulatory agencies worldwide, primarily UN member states. Since its inception in 1928, the ICRP has served as the basis for radiation protection and value based judgements in protecting both human and non-human biota. In 2011, the commission published (ICRP Pub. 118) its review of epidemiological studies and decided to recommend a change to the previously established eye dose limit. Based on the review of the literature and the research conducted within the academic, veterinary, nuclear and medical industry, there is general consensus in Canada and among IAEA members states that the dose limit for the lens of the eye should be reduced from the original proposed limit, but not to the recommendations suggested by ICRP 118.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Das_Ryan_2018 11_Medical Physics.pdf
Open Access
1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue