Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27371
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Walter, Dr. Stephen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Islam, Ismat | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-11T20:23:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-11T20:23:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/27371 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We compared several group and individual testing strategies in terms of cost and accuracy and then showed which one is more accurate while costing as little as possible for a specified prevalence rate. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Group testing, Individual Testing, prevalence rate | en_US |
dc.subject | Screening, Cost, Accuracy, Error | en_US |
dc.title | Cost and accuracy analysis of group and individual testing strategies: Implications for COVID 19 | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Mathematics and Statistics | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Islam_Ismat_Binta_2021December_MasterOfScience(MSc).pdf | 2.23 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.