Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDukas, Reuven-
dc.contributor.authorScott, Andrew M.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T19:30:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-01T19:30:30Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/26949-
dc.description.abstractA rich diversity of social behaviours exists in the animal kingdom, and these behaviours have evolved to perform a variety of adaptive functions. Social behaviours show variation both among and within species, however the mechanisms that give rise to this variation are not well understood. Using fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster), my goal was to uncover the genetic and behavioural mechanisms that underpin natural variation in two different social behaviours: sociability and sexual aggression. First, I showed that sociability, which is the tendency of animals to engage in friendly activities together, is influenced by indirect genetic effects (IGEs), and that encounters among individuals drive these effects (Chapter 2). I then showed that sociability and social plasticity have low-moderate heritability (Chapter 3), and sociability is not correlated between the sexes or with activity. I then generated lineages of flies with high and low sociability using artificial selection (Chapter 4). The evolved lineages had significantly diverged sociability which was not associated with fitness measures or nearest-neighbor distances, but was negatively correlated with intrasexual aggression (Chapter 4). Finally, in sexual aggression, which I quantified as male forced copulation rate, I showed that evolved differences and differences due to social plasticity were both associated with the differential expression of many genes, but only a few of these genes were significant in both (Chapter 5). I also showed that these sets of genes are enriched in neuropeptide hormone and serotonin gene ontology categories, and that 4 of 7 chosen genes were validated for their effects on sexual aggression. Overall, this thesis sheds light on the complex mechanisms that underlie variation in these social behaviours, and it paves the way for future research to further elucidate some of these mechanisms, especially on the genetic basis of sociability using the evolved lineages I generated.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSocial behaviouren_US
dc.subjectSociabilityen_US
dc.subjectFruit fliesen_US
dc.subjectDrosophilaen_US
dc.subjectSexual aggressionen_US
dc.subjectAggressionen_US
dc.subjectIndirect genetic effectsen_US
dc.subjectArtificial selectionen_US
dc.subjectHeritabilityen_US
dc.subjectSocial plasticityen_US
dc.subjectRNAseqen_US
dc.subjectDifferential expressionen_US
dc.subjectForced copulationen_US
dc.subjectGenetic correlationen_US
dc.titleTHE GENETIC AND BEHAVIOURAL UNDERPINNINGS OF NATURAL VARIATION IN SOCIAL BEHAVIOURen_US
dc.title.alternativeTHE GENETIC AND BEHAVIOURAL UNDERPINNINGS OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOURen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractIndividual animals tend to vary in many traits including social behaviours. Using fruit flies, my goal was to understand what causes individuals to vary in two social behaviours: sociability and sexual aggression. I found that highly sociable flies tended to influence other flies to become more sociable due to a change in how much these flies interacted. I also found that individual differences in sociability are moderately heritable, and the genetic variation contributing to this is different between the sexes. Also, less sociable flies tended to be more aggressive than highly sociable flies. Finally, for sexual aggression, I showed that variation in a male’s success in forcibly mating with a female was associated with changes in the expression of hundreds of genes, but these changes were mostly unique for evolved versus environmentally induced variation. Future work will similarly look to identify genes involved with individual differences in sociability.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Scott_Andrew_M_2021Sept_PhD.pdf
Open Access
2.97 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue