Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26668
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeering, Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorGrandfield, Kathryn-
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T19:44:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-13T19:44:39Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013-
dc.identifier.citationDeering J, Grandfield K. Current interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A review. Biomaterials Biosyst. 2021;2:100013.en_US
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/26668-
dc.description.abstractRecent advances in the field of metallic additive manufacturing have expanded production capabilities for bone implants to include porous lattice structures. While traditional models of de novo bone formation can be applied to fully dense implant materials, their applicability to the interior of porous materials has not been well-characterized. Unlike other reviews that focus on materials and mechanical properties of lattice structures, this review compiles biological performance from in vivo studies in pre-clinical models only. First, we introduce the most common lattice geometry designs employed in vivo and discuss some of their fabrication advantages and limitations. Then lattice geometry is correlated to quantitative (histomorphometric) and qualitative (histological) assessments of osseointegration. We group studies according to two common implant variables: pore size and percent porosity, and explore the extent of osseointegration using common measures, including bone-implant contact (BIC), bone area (BA), bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) and biomechanical stability, for various animal models and implantation times. Based on this, trends related to in vivo bone formation on the interior of lattice structures are presented. Common challenges with lattice structures are highlighted, including nonuniformity of bone growth through the entirety of the lattice structure due to occlusion effects and avascularity. This review paper identifies a lack of systematic in vivo studies on porous AM implants to target optimum geometric design, including pore shape, size, and percent porosity in controlled animal models and critical-sized defects. Further work focusing on surface modification strategies and systematic geometric studies to homogenize in vivo bone growth through the scaffold interior are recommended to increase implant stability in the early stages of osseointegration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectOsseointegrationen_US
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturingen_US
dc.subject3D printingen_US
dc.subjectHistomorphometryen_US
dc.subjectMetallic implant designen_US
dc.subjectIn vivoen_US
dc.subjectPorousen_US
dc.subjectTissue engineeringen_US
dc.titleCurrent interpretations on the in vivo response of bone to additively manufactured metallic porous scaffolds: A reviewen_US
dc.typePostprinten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMaterials Science and Engineeringen_US
Appears in Collections:Student Publications (Not Graduate Theses)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2021_BBiosy_Deering_Grandfield.pdf
Open Access
626.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue