Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty Publications (via McMaster Experts)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26559
Title: Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma for severe COVID-19 based on evidence in other severe respiratory viral infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Devasenapathy N
Ye Z
Loeb M
Fang F
Najafabadi BT
Xiao Y
Couban R
Bégin P
Guyatt G
Keywords: Betacoronavirus;COVID-19;Clinical Trials as Topic;Coronavirus Infections;Evidence-Based Medicine;Humans;Immunization, Passive;Influenza, Human;Pandemics;Pneumonia, Viral;Respiratory Tract Infections;Risk Assessment;SARS-CoV-2;Treatment Outcome
Publication Date: 6-Jul-2020
Publisher: CMA Joule Inc.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. To support a guideline on COVID-19 management, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of convalescent plasma in COVID-19 and other severe respiratory viral infections. METHODS: In March 2020, we searched international and Chinese biomedical literature databases, clinical trial registries and prepublication sources for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized studies comparing patients receiving and not receiving convalescent plasma. We included patients with acute coronavirus, influenza and Ebola virus infections. We conducted a meta-analysis using random-effects models and assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS: Of 1099 unique records, 6 studies were eligible, and none of these included patients with COVID-19. One nonrandomized study (n = 40) on convalescent plasma in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) provided uninformative results regarding mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] CI 0.01 to 1.70). Pooled estimates from 4 RCTs on influenza (n = 572) showed no convincing effects on deaths (4 RCTs, RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.81), complete recovery (2 RCTs, odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.64) or length of stay (3 RCTs, mean difference -1.62, 95% CI -3.82 to 0.58, d). The quality of evidence was very low for all efficacy outcomes. Convalescent plasma caused few or no serious adverse events in influenza RCTs (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.29, low-quality evidence). INTERPRETATION: Studies of non-COVID-19 severe respiratory viral infections provide indirect, very low-quality evidence that raises the possibility that convalescent plasma has minimal or no benefit in the treatment of COVID-19 and low-quality evidence that it does not cause serious adverse events.
metadata.dc.rights.license: Attribution - CC BY
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26559
metadata.dc.identifier.doi: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200642
ISSN: 0820-3946
1488-2329
Appears in Collections:Faculty Publications (via McMaster Experts)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Efficacy and safety of convalescent plasma for severe COVID-19 based on evidence in other severe respiratory viral infections- a systematic review and meta-analysis.pdf
Open Access
Published version230.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue