Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDudley, Susan-
dc.contributor.authorMcHaffie, Mara-
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T19:25:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-25T19:25:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/26268-
dc.description.abstractEcological restoration, or assisting the recovery of damaged ecosystems, is recognized as a crucial activity for reversing biodiversity loss across the globe. Roadside rights-of-way may be suitable areas for the restoration of endangered grassland communities, because they occupy significant areas of underutilized land, are managed as early successional plant communities, and may serve as corridors for wildlife movement and gene flow. However, though many roadside restoration projects have been undertaken in North America, few studies have evaluated their long-term success and most monitoring is narrow in scope. True restoration includes restoring an appropriate species composition, vegetation structure and ecosystem functions, and thus these ecosystem components must be measured when evaluating success. I assessed the plant community, bee community, soil carbon and plant-fungal relationships at roadside restorations of various ages along three major highways in Southern Ontario and compared these measures to unrestored roadsides and reference sites. I found that roadside restorations successfully increased native plant richness, though not to the level of a remnant grassland. Bee communities varied mostly by highway rather than site type, though bee abundance was positively correlated with plant diversity and bare ground. Soil carbon in roadside sites was similar to that of a remnant grassland but did not differ among restored and control sites. Plant growth response to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi collected from roadside sites varied depending on the site and showed a weak negative correlation with site age. Taken together, these results suggest that roadside restoration can benefit some ecosystem components, but simply seeding native plants along roadsides may not be sufficient for improving ecosystem function. This study highlights the importance of evaluating success in a comprehensive manner that includes multiple ecosystem components.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectrestorationen_US
dc.subjectgrasslanden_US
dc.subjectroadsideen_US
dc.subjectmonitoringen_US
dc.subjectdiversityen_US
dc.subjectbeeen_US
dc.titleEvaluating the Success of Ontario Roadside Restorations - An Ecosystem Approachen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractEcological restoration is crucial for reversing global biodiversity loss. Roadsides may be suitable for the restoration of grassland ecosystems, but few studies have comprehensively evaluated the long-term success of roadside restorations. I assessed the plant community, bee community, soil carbon and plant-fungal relationships at roadside restorations along three Southern Ontario highways and compared these measures to unrestored roadsides and a remnant grassland. Restoration increased native plant diversity, though not to remnant levels. Bee communities varied mostly by highway, though bee abundance was positively correlated with plant diversity. Soil carbon in roadside sites was similar to the remnant but did not differ among restored and unrestored sites. Plant response to soil fungi collected from roadside sites varied significantly by site. Thus, roadside restoration can benefit some ecosystem components, but more intervention may be required to restore ecosystem function. This study highlights the importance of evaluating restoration success in a comprehensive manner.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
McHaffie_Mara_B_2020September_MSc.pdf
Open Access
6.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue