Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26141
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorShedden, Judith-
dc.contributor.advisorvon Mohrenschildt, Martin-
dc.contributor.authorKenney, Darren-
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-13T01:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-01-13T01:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/26141-
dc.description.abstractSelf-motion perception is based on the integration of visual (optic flow) and vestibular (inertial) sensory information. Previous research has shown that the relative contribution of visual and vestibular cues can change in real time based on the reliability of that information. The present study assessed whether initial velocity and acceleration magnitude influence the relative contribution of these cues to the detection of self-acceleration. Participants performed a simple response time task with visual and vestibular self-acceleration cues as targets. Visual optic flow was presented at three possible initial velocities of 3, 9, or 15 m/s, and accelerated to result in three possible final velocities of 21, 27, or 33 m/s. Corresponding vestibular cues were presented at magnitudes between 0.01 and 0.04 g. The self-acceleration cues were presented at three possible stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs): visual-first (by 100 ms), in-sync, and vestibular-first (by 100 ms). We found that presenting the cues in-sync resulted in the fastest responses across all velocities and acceleration magnitudes. Interestingly, presenting the visual cue first resulted in a relative advantage over vestibular-first at the slowest initial velocity of 3 m/s, and vice versa for the fastest initial velocity of 15 m/s. The fastest overall responses for visual-first and in-sync were observed at 9 m/s. The present results support the hypothesis that velocity of optic flow can alter the relative contribution of visual and vestibular cues to the detection of self-acceleration.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAccelerationen_US
dc.subjectMotion simulatoren_US
dc.subjectMultisensory integrationen_US
dc.subjectVestibular systemen_US
dc.subjectSelf-motionen_US
dc.subjectOptic flowen_US
dc.titleVelocity Influences the Relative Contributions of Visual and Vestibular Cues to Self-Acceleration Perceptionen_US
dc.title.alternativeVelocity and Self-Acceleration Perceptionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis thesis contributes valuable insight into the emerging literature on how visual and vestibular cues are integrated to result in reliable self-motion perception. Specifically, this thesis provides evidence that velocity of optic flow plays an important role in mediating the relative weighting of visual and vestibular cues during acceleration perception.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MSc Thesis.pdf
Open Access
803.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue