Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26081
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGeorgiades, Stelios-
dc.contributor.advisorHall, Geoffrey-
dc.contributor.authorAssi, Amanda-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-16T03:27:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-16T03:27:53Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/26081-
dc.descriptionUpdated: Current version includes the name of Supervisor, and Co-supervisor. Error corrected in preliminary pages.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Emerging evidence suggests that there is both within-disorder heterogeneity and across-disorder overlap in the clinical presentation of children with ASD, ADHD, and OCD. Two prevalent dimensional phenotypes in children with these NDDs that warrant close attention, and are suitable for cross-disorder investigation, are internalizing and externalizing problems. Objectives: The current study uses a data-driven, diagnosis-agnostic approach to identify homogenous clusters that describe behavioural profiles of internalizing and externalizing problems within and across ASD, ADHD, and OCD. Methods: Data on 1565 children (M = 10.76 years) were drawn from the Province of Ontario Neurodevelopmental Disorder (POND) Network. Non-hierarchical clustering approaches were used to empirically derive, distinct behavioural profiles of internalizing and externalizing problems indexed by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Empirically derived groups were characterized using measures of adaptive functioning indexed by the Adaptive Behaviour Assessment (ABAS-II), and interpreted in relation to original diagnoses. Results: Cluster analyses identified four distinct behavioural profiles that cut across all diagnostic groups: High Internalizing Externalizing (HIE; 15%), High Externalizing (HE; 21%), Low Internalizing Externalizing (LIE; 38%), and Low Externalizing (LE; 26%). Derived clusters had variable levels of adaptive behaviours and reflected different behavioural profiles than the ones defined by the original diagnostic category groups of ASD, ADHD, and OCD. Conclusion: Data-driven, diagnosis-agnostic approaches can inform our understanding of the between and within phenotypic heterogeneity seen in ASD, ADHD, and OCD. Empirical ways of classifying children with homogeneous behavioural profiles may complement existing diagnostic models in our efforts to develop cross-disorder, more personalized interventions for children with neurodevelopmental disorders.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectinternalizing behavioursen_US
dc.subjectexternalizing behavioursen_US
dc.subjectbehavioural phenotypesen_US
dc.subjectAutismen_US
dc.subjectASDen_US
dc.subjectADHDen_US
dc.subjectOCDen_US
dc.subjectneurodevelopmental disordersen_US
dc.titleInternalizing and Externalizing Problems in Children with ASD, ADHD, and OCD: Identifying Behavioural Profiles Within and Across Diagnostic Categoriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeBehavioural Profiles Within and Across ASD, ADHD, and OCDen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNeuroscienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractASD, ADHD, and OCD are heterogenous neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) with some overlapping clinical characteristics and etiological factors. Internalizing and externalizing behavioural problems persist across these three NDDs, and in this study, are used to identify unique behavioural profiles. Study findings reveal four groups with distinct behavioural profiles of internalizing and externalizing problems that are not identified by the original diagnostic groups. This empirical way of classifying children with similar behavioural profiles can be used in combination with diagnostic labels to enhance transdiagnostic interventions that can be tailored to each child’s needs.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Assi_Amanda_2020December_MSc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2021-12-11
877.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue