Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25793
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSchünemann, Holger-
dc.contributor.authorDarzi, Andrea-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T17:38:50Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-15T17:38:50Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/25793-
dc.description.abstractDetermining the prognosis or risk of an individual experiencing a specific health outcome within a certain time period is essential to improve health. An important aspect of prognostic research is the development of risk assessment models (RAMs). In support of the movement towards personalized medicine, health care professionals have employed RAMs to stratify an individual patient’s absolute risk of developing a health condition and select the optimal management strategy for that patient. The development of RAMs is generally conducted using data driven methods or through expert consensus. However, these methods present limitations. Accordingly, we recognized the need to select factors for RAM development or update that are evidence-based and clinically relevant using a structured and transparent approach. In this sandwich thesis, I highlight the methods used to select prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding RAMs for hospitalized medical patients. However, the same methods can be applied to any clinical outcome of interest. This work presents a conceptualized and tested novel mixed methods approach to select prognostic factors for VTE and bleeding in hospitalized medical patients that are evidence-based, clinically meaningful and relevant. Our findings may inform the development of new RAMs, the update of widely used RAMs, and external validation and prospective impact assessment studies. Also, these findings may assist decision makers in evaluating the risk of an individual having an outcome to optimize patient care.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectrisk assessment model, prediction, prognosis, venous thromboembolism, venous thromboembolism, bleeding, hospitalized medical patients, GRADE, guidelines, clinical expertiseen_US
dc.titleRisk Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Hospitalized Medical Patientsen_US
dc.title.alternativeVENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AND BLEEDING IN MEDICAL INPATIENTSen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractMeasuring the probability of an individual experiencing a specific health outcome in a certain period of time based on that individual’s risk factors is important to improve health. Prediction tools are often used to calculate the probability of an outcome. Health care practitioners use prediction tools to assess an individual’s risk of a certain health outcome and in turn provide individualized management. Prediction tools include a number of agreed upon risk factors that should be assessed in order to best estimate the risk of an outcome. These risk factors are usually selected through exploring sets of data or by consulting a group of experts in the field. However, these methods have limitations. Therefore, we recognized that it is important, when developing prediction tools, to select risk factors that are evidence-based and clinically relevant by adopting a systematic, comprehensive, structured and transparent approach. These sets of risk factors can then aid health researchers when developing new prediction tools or updating existing ones and help clinicians predicting risk. In this thesis, I highlight the methods used to select factors for prediction tools that evaluate the risk of having a venous clot or a bleeding event in patients that are hospitalized for a medical condition. However, the same methods can be applied to any clinical condition and outcome of interest. This work presents a new approach that we conceptualized and tested to select risk factors for venous clots and bleeding events in hospitalized medical patients that are evidence-based, clinically meaningful and relevant. Our findings may inform the development of new prediction tools, the update of widely used tools, and the design of studies to validate these tools. Also, these findings may assist decision makers in evaluating the risk of an individual having an outcome to optimize patient care.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Darzi_Andrea_J_finalsubmission2020august_PhD.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2021-03-05
5.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue