Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25765
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDobbins, Maureen-
dc.contributor.authorBelita, Emily-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-02T19:10:39Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-02T19:10:39Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/25765-
dc.description.abstractBackground: There are professional expectations for public health nurses to engage in and develop competencies in evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM). The purpose of this research study was to develop and psychometrically test a measure to assess competence in EIDM among public health nurses. Methods: Guided by the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014), a three stage study was employed to develop and psychometrically evaluate the new self-report EIDM Competence Measure: 1) Stage one: a systematic review of existing measures assessing four EIDM competence attributes of knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours; 2) Stage two: item development for the EIDM Competence Measure comprised of four subscales (knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours); and 3) Stage three: psychometric testing (reliability, validity, acceptability) which included item reduction from an original 40-item to a final 27-item tool. Results: The EIDM Competence Measure consists of 27 items aligning with a four-factor model of EIDM knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours establishing internal structure validity. Cronbach’s alpha for these four factors was 0.96, 0.93, 0.80, and 0.94, respectively. Significant associations between EIDM competence subscale scores and education, EIDM training/project involvement, and organizational culture established validity based on relationships to other variables. For the original 40-item tool, missing data was minimal as 93% of participants completed all items and mean completion time was 7 minutes and 20 seconds. Conclusions: The EIDM Competence Measure is a conceptually and psychometrically robust instrument that has potential for use in public health nursing practice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectpublic health nursingen_US
dc.subjectcompetence assessmenten_US
dc.subjectevidence-informed decision-makingen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and Psychometric Assessment of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for Public Health Nursingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNursingen_US
dc.description.degreetypeDissertationen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.description.layabstractNurses who work in public health have professional expectations to participate in evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM). Because of this, it is important to measure how competent they are in EIDM. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a tool that measures EIDM competence among public health nurses using a three-stage study. The first stage involved reviewing literature on existing tools that measure different components of EIDM competence including EIDM knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours among nurses. The second stage involved using existing tool items and developing new items for a new tool named the EIDM Competence Measure. In the third stage, the EIDM Competence Measure was tested to assess its validity, reliability, and acceptability among public health nurses in Ontario. The EIDM Competence Measure was found to have strong validity, reliability, and acceptability, showing that there is potential for its use in public health nursing practice.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Belita_Emily_L_FinalSubmission2020August_PhD.pdf
Open Access
4.6 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue