Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25541
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRochwerg, Bram-
dc.contributor.advisorXie, Feng-
dc.contributor.advisorCook, Deborah-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Vincent-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T08:37:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T08:37:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/25541-
dc.description.abstractVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the intensive care unit, resulting in a high burden of illness, mortality and increased cost. The literature around the cost-effectiveness of probiotics in prevention of health-care associated infections has not been previously well-described, and a definitive health economic evaluation alongside a well-designed randomized control trial assessing probiotic prophylaxis has not been previously performed. This thesis consists of 3 separate manuscripts (with 2 published in peer-reviewed journals and 1 pending). The theme of this thesis was to: (1) describe the literature about the cost-effectiveness of probiotics in hospitalized patients in preventing healthcare-associated infections; (2) design a protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a randomized control trial (RCT) examining probiotic prophylaxis of VAP; and then (3) perform and analyze the health economic evaluation presented in the protocol. The first component of this thesis is a systematic review of probiotic prophylaxis of healthcare-associated infections in hospitalized patients. We performed an extensive search including multiple databases which found 7 studies. Probiotics demonstrated favourable cost-effectiveness in 6 of 7 (86%) economic evaluations, with 3 studies being manufacturer-supported, all suggesting cost-effectiveness. Certainty of cost-effectiveness evidence was very low due to risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency using the GRADE approach. Hence further RCTs with economic evaluations were stated as a solution. The second component of this thesis is a study protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the Probiotics to Prevent Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT), which assessed the efficacy of probiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (specifically VAP). The third component of this thesis is the cost-effectiveness analysis performed utilizing the individual patient data from PROSPECT to produce the economic evaluation (E-PROSPECT). As of the date of thesis submission, PROSPECT is still pending publication, and hence E-PROSPECT is also pending analysis and publication. However, I have prepared a draft manuscript (along with figures and tables) that will be produced at the conclusion of E-PROSPECT for thesis committee review.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjecthealth economic evaluationen_US
dc.subjectprobioticsen_US
dc.subjecthealthcare-associated infectionsen_US
dc.subjectventilator-associated pneumoniaen_US
dc.subjectcost-effectiveness analysisen_US
dc.subjectsystematic reviewen_US
dc.subjectprotocol and statistical analysis planen_US
dc.subjectintensive care unitsen_US
dc.subjectPROSPECTen_US
dc.subjectcritical careen_US
dc.titleHEALTH ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF PROBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS IN CRITICAL ILLNESS FOR PREVENTION OF HEALTHCARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONSen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Health Sciences (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common healthcare-associated infection in the intensive care unit, resulting in a high burden of illness, mortality and increased cost. The literature around the cost-effectiveness of probiotics in prevention of health-care associated infections has not been previously well-described, and a definitive health economic evaluation alongside a well-designed randomized control trial assessing probiotic prophylaxis has not been previously performed. This thesis consists of 3 separate manuscripts (with 2 published in peer-reviewed journals and 1 pending). The theme of this thesis was to: (1) describe the literature about the cost-effectiveness of probiotics in hospitalized patients in preventing healthcare-associated infections; (2) design a protocol for an economic evaluation alongside a randomized control trial (RCT) examining probiotic prophylaxis of VAP; and then (3) perform and analyze the health economic evaluation presented in the protocol. The first component of this thesis is a systematic review of probiotic prophylaxis of healthcare-associated infections in hospitalized patients. We performed an extensive search including multiple databases which found 7 studies. Probiotics demonstrated favourable cost-effectiveness in 6 of 7 (86%) economic evaluations, with 3 studies being manufacturer-supported, all suggesting cost-effectiveness. Certainty of cost-effectiveness evidence was very low due to risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency using the GRADE approach. Hence further RCTs with economic evaluations were stated as a solution. The second component of this thesis is a study protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the Probiotics to Prevent Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT), which assessed the efficacy of probiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of healthcare-associated infections (specifically VAP). The third component of this thesis is the cost-effectiveness analysis performed utilizing the individual patient data from PROSPECT to produce the economic evaluation (E-PROSPECT). As of the date of thesis submission, PROSPECT is still pending publication, and hence E-PROSPECT is also pending analysis and publication. However, I have prepared a draft manuscript (along with figures and tables) that will be produced at the conclusion of E-PROSPECT for thesis committee review.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Lau_Vincent_I_2020_Jul_8_MSc Thesis (McMaster).pdf
Open Access
2.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue