Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25540
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGuyatt, Gordon H.-
dc.contributor.authorSiemieniuk, Reed Alexander Cunningham-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T08:24:21Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-20T08:24:21Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/25540-
dc.descriptionThis thesis explores the Rapid Recommendations process, a new responsive way of creating clinical practice guidelines.en_US
dc.description.abstractHealthcare workers rely on clinical practice guidelines to inform their practice. However, most guidelines are not trustworthy when judged by accepted standards and they typically take several years to produce. Guideline trustworthiness is undermined by panel members who often have conflicts of interest, by including representation from only a subset of stakeholders, by failing to examine the entirety of the evidence systematically, and by rapid obsolescence. Further, they are often difficult for users to understand in limited time. Rather than updating guidance on a fixed schedule, the Rapid Recommendations approach involves continuous monitoring of the literature and produces guidelines in response to new potentially practice-changing evidence. A collaborative network of clinicians, methodologists, and patients respond by rapidly producing trustworthy evidence syntheses and guidance. We have identified efficiencies at every step of the guideline development process. The guideline panel does not include anyone with a financial conflict of interest and there are strict limits professional and intellectual conflicts. Systematic reviews are produced on the relative effects of each option, on prognosis, and on patient values and preferences with the explicit intent to inform the question at hand. The panel also considers practical issues. Rapid Recommendations are published in a concise multilayered user-friendly format headed by an interactive infographic that contains all of the necessary information for users need to make informed decisions at the point of care. The guideline is published simultaneously in print and electronically, including decision aids that can be used at the point of care and integrated into electronic medical records. In this thesis, you will find a selection of exemplary publications relevant to the Rapid Recommendations process. We show that a responsive approach to rapid and trustworthy guideline creation is possible. It represents a way forward from the current limitations that plague most current clinical practice guidelines.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectClinical practice guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectResearch methodsen_US
dc.subjectRapid reviewsen_US
dc.subjectRapid guidelinesen_US
dc.titleRAPID RECOMMENDATIONS: IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY AND TRUSTWORTHINESS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND GUIDELINESen_US
dc.title.alternativeRAPID RECOMMENDATIONSen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeCandidate in Philosophyen_US
dc.description.layabstractHealthcare workers often decide what to do in practice based on the advice of experts through clinical practice guidelines. However, most clinical practice guidelines are not completely trustworthy. Guideline authors often have conflicts of interest, do not include patients or patient views, and are created so slowly that they rapidly fall into obsolescence. This thesis explores a new way of developing clinical practice guidelines that we call Rapid Recommendations. Instead of creating them on a fixed schedule (i.e., every few years), they are created in response to new studies that might change practice. The scope is limited, and timelines are shorter, meaning that the guidelines are published sooner. The guideline authors include all stakeholders, including patients. None of the authors have any financial interests in the topic, and other conflicts are minimized. The guidelines are published on an expedited basis and in an accessible online multilayered format with infographics. This thesis includes a selection of exemplary publications relevant to the Rapid Recommendations process.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thesis Jul2020.pdf
Open Access
15.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue