Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/25507
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAtkinson, Stephanie-
dc.contributor.authorMaran, Atherai-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-24T20:53:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-24T20:53:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/25507-
dc.description.abstractRationale & Background: Gaining excessive adiposity in pregnancy is associated with altered cardiometabolic profile and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Lifestyle interventions may reduce excess weight gain, but the effect on fat gain is unclear. Our study explored this question by 1) comparing measures of body fat (BF) by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and 4-site skinfold thickness (SFT); 2) assessing the impact of a nutrition+exercise intervention on adiposity changes; 3) elucidating associations between adiposity changes and cardiometabolic biomarkers and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design: Participants randomized to receive a high dairy protein diet and exercise program (intervention) or standard care (control) in the Be Healthy in Pregnancy RCT (NCT 01689961) had adiposity measured at 12-17, 26-28, and 36-38 weeks gestation by BIA (%BF) and SFT (sum and %BF), and at 6 months postpartum also by DXA. Fasted blood samples collected at 12-17 and 36-38 weeks gestation were analyzed for glucose, lipid profile, insulin, leptin, adiponectin, and CRP. Pregnancy outcomes were abstracted from medical charts. Results: In 181 participants, BIA %BF and SFT %BF had good agreement in early pregnancy and postpartum, but low agreement in late pregnancy. Adiposity changes across pregnancy were similar between study arms but were greater in normal weight compared to overweight women. Insulin and leptin were negatively associated with change in SFT (sum and %BF). Triglycerides were negatively associated with change in BIA %BF, while HDL was positively associated. Neither caesarean section nor operative vaginal delivery were associated with adiposity change. Conclusion: Adiposity measured by sum of SFT and BIA %BF increased across pregnancy but was not influenced by the diet+exercise intervention. Associations of adiposity change with cardiometabolic biomarkers varied between measurement tools. The lack of adiposity measurement tools appropriate across pregnancy and in clinical settings presents a concern for assessing clinical responses to adiposity change across pregnancy.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectadiposityen_US
dc.subjectcardiometabolic biomarkersen_US
dc.subjectpregnancyen_US
dc.subjectintervention trialen_US
dc.subjectperinatal nutritionen_US
dc.titleMaternal body adiposity changes during pregnancy and association with cardiometabolic status and adverse outcomes in a randomized nutrition+exercise intervention trialen_US
dc.title.alternativeMaternal adiposity changes during pregnancyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractPregnancy is associated with a natural gain in body fat, but it can reach excessive amounts. Excess body fat is of clinical consequence as it is associated with poor cardiovascular health and abnormal pregnancy outcomes. Improving diet and physical activity habits may reduce excess weight gain, but little is known about how it influences fat gained during pregnancy. In our study body fat gain during pregnancy was similar between the lifestyle intervention and control groups. However, entering pregnancy with greater BMI was associated with less fat gain during pregnancy. Changes in body fat influenced cardiovascular blood markers, but results differed between body fat assessment tools. We also found that methods to measure body fat produce different results at different stages of pregnancy. Our findings provide insight on the factors that influence fat gain during pregnancy and highlight the need for better tools to measure body fat accurately in pregnancy.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Maran_Atherai_finalsubmission2020June_MSc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2021-06-16
1.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue