Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24619
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKorol, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorVenneri, Rita-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-24T16:35:30Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-24T16:35:30Z-
dc.date.issued2003-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24619-
dc.description.abstractIn 1987, Gro Harlem Bruntland formally introduced and popularized the concept of sustainable development. She defined it as being “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own” (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987). Several cities, including the City of Hamilton have adopted certain environmental practices and technologies in an endeavor to improve their level of urban sustainability and achieve Bruntland’s goal of sustainable development. These practices include the support of individuals and city organizations that investigate new sustainable design alternatives for current infrastructure development. Such sustainable alternatives include the consumption of locally grown produce to avoid the detrimental effects associated with the transportation of imported foods via transport trucks, the installation of Rooftop Gardens as a viable option of ‘greening’ modern urban landscapes, and the construction of R-2000 Homes to reduce energy consumption rates and decrease the levels of harmful emissions that would normally be produced by conventional homes. The implications and/or benefits associated with any of the aforementioned designs were calculated using an environmental assessment tool developed by a professor at the University of British Columbia: Ecological Footprint (EF) Analysis. The final results of this study indicated that consuming locally grown produce, installing Rooftop Gardens, and living in R-2000 homes have the potential to enhance the state of the environment by improving air quality, reducing energy consumption, reducing water consumption, improving storm water retention, or by enhancing the biodiversity of a city’s landscape. However, in order to reap the benefits of any or all of the above ‘green’ practices or technologies and begin to establish a sustainable community, the fundamental doctrines that have influenced modern development practices, particularly those that place economic progress in front of the conservation and preservation of the environment, will need to be changed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectgreen practicesen_US
dc.subjectgreen technologiesen_US
dc.subjectsustainable communitiesen_US
dc.subjectgreen practices and technologiesen_US
dc.subjectcivil engineeringen_US
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten_US
dc.titleGreen Practices and Technologies for Sustainable Communitiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Engineering (ME)en_US
Appears in Collections:Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Venneri_Rita_M_2003Dec_masters.pdf
Open Access
4.17 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue