Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorEmerson, Claudia-
dc.contributor.advisorGedge, Elisabeth-
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Leanne-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-19T17:25:04Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-19T17:25:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24566-
dc.descriptionDiscussion of manipulation as a form of undermining the consent of participants in clinical reserach, and specifically pregnant women who are HIV positive..en_US
dc.description.abstractI will argue that the relationship between the clinician scientist and the participant in the ACTG 076 trials involved unethically manipulative elements. My question of unethical manipulation examines the relationship between the clinician scientist and the participant. My first chapter establishes manipulation as follows, ‘A manipulates B if and only if A motivates B to make a decision or perform an action that bypasses B’s rational capacities by means of deception, emotional pressure, or exploitation of B’s ego depleted state.’ I argue that manipulation is prima facie unethical because it violates one’s autonomy. In the second chapter I examine the concerns of illness, gender roles, pregnancy, and HIV status, which can cause ego depletion and increase the participants’ vulnerability to manipulation. After analysis, I conclude that, although none of these elements can be eliminated as concerns for the clinician scientist, if they are not adequately accounted for, the clinician scientist has unethically manipulated the participant to enter and remain a part of the trial. I suggest that an adequate account would involve special consideration of how these vulnerabilities interact within the specific context of the trial. My third and final chapter will relate my conclusions to the current and upcoming research that is actively incorporating pregnant women as participants.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBioethicsen_US
dc.subjectResearch Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectVulnerabilityen_US
dc.subjectManipulationen_US
dc.titleUnethical Manipulation of Participants in Clinical Trialsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
dc.description.layabstractThis thesis will examine the need to include the term “manipulation” into current ethical guidelines for Western bioethics because manipulation is a concept that is separate from concepts such as “coercion,” “force,” “exploitation,” or “undue influence” which appear in current Western bioethical guidelines. Manipulation is an unethical influence of another’s decision-making that undermines their autonomy, whereas autonomy is a key feature of Western bioethics and must be fostered rather than undermined or hindered. This thesis will discuss a clinical case in which pregnant women with HIV were enrolled in a clinical trial and I will discuss how illness, gender, pregnancy, and HIV status can cause one’s ego to be depleted so that they are more vulnerable to manipulation than other clinical participants. Finally, I will recommend that states, ethics boards, and researchers are the primary actors responsible for ensuring that participants are not manipulated in clinical research settings.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Woodward_Leanne_M_201905_MasterofArts.pdf
Open Access
2.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue