Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Engineering
  4. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
  5. Materials Science and Engineering Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24387
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSheykh-jaberi, F.-
dc.contributor.authorCockcroft, S.L.-
dc.contributor.authorMaijer, D.M.-
dc.contributor.authorPhillion, A.B.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-15T13:25:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-15T13:25:24Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029-
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029-
dc.identifier.issn10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.10.029-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24387-
dc.description.abstractThe semi-solid constitutive behaviour of two commercially important aluminum foundry alloys, AA B206 and AA A356, has been quantified using a Gleeble thermo-mechanical physical simulation system. For these tests, a series of samples were extracted from a directionally-solidified wedge casting. The samples were further classified by their microstructure, average grain size of 128, 220, or 325 μm for B206, and average secondary dendrite arm spacing (SDAS) of 43, 90, or 124 μm for A356. The results indicate that at high solid fraction, 0.95<fs<1, B206 had a higher yield stress than A356. However, at lower solid fraction, fs<0.95, A356 had the higher yield stress. In both alloys, an increase in the microstructure (grain size or SDAS), resulted in a decrease in the semi-solid ductility. The effect of microstructure on yield stress was minimal. The minimum solid fraction when the yield stress reached a very low value, known as the rigidity point, was shown to be 0.93 and 0.80 for B206 and A356, respectively. This significant difference in rigidity demonstrates the importance of the eutectic on reducing hot tearing susceptibility.en_US
dc.subjectMetal castingen_US
dc.subjectAluminum alloysen_US
dc.subjectSemisolid constitutive behaviouren_US
dc.subjectHot tearingen_US
dc.subjectMicrostructureen_US
dc.titleComparison of the semi-solid constitutive behaviour of A356 and B206 aluminum foundry alloysen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
Appears in Collections:Materials Science and Engineering Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2018_JMPT_SheykhJaberi_etal.pdf
Open Access
1.66 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue