Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRawls, William-
dc.contributor.authorSathya, Pushpa-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-02T19:08:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-02T19:08:23Z-
dc.date.issued1989-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24325-
dc.description.abstractHuman papillomaviruses (HPV) have been implicated as etiologic agents in the genesis of cervical carcinoma and certain other benign lesions of the cervix. Clinical and epidemiological data, and the demonstration of HPV 16 viral DNA sequences in cervical cancer biopsies lend support to the etiologic association of HPV type 16 and cervical carcinoma. Interpretation of the association between HPV 16 and cervical cancer is limited by methods of detection. Different methods of detection of viral DNA sequences have been used based on DNA-DNA hybridization. Recently, a method based upon the in vitro enzymatic amplification of specific viral DNA sequences or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been used. The purpose of this study was to compare PCR with DNA-DNA hybridization methods in clinical specimens obtained from invasive cervical cancer. The in vitro enzymatic amplification or PCR was carried out on three specific regions of HPV 16. E6, E7 and L1 regions of HPV 16 were chosen as the target sequences of amplification and primers were synthesized specific to these regions. PCR was performed on 163 cervical cancer specimens using primers specific for E6 and E7 regions of HPV 16. 112 of these specimens were also analyzed using L1 primers of HPV 16. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the different methods to see if PCR is a better, more sensitive method compared to the other methods were computed. The results suggest that although percent positivity by PCR method increases significantly, thereby improving sensitivity of detection, the specificity suffers compared to the other methods. However the advantages of using PCR as a diagnostic tool are attractive, as it requires only picogram quantities of DNA, is rapid and easy to perform, and is amenable to automation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjecthuman papillomavirusen_US
dc.subjecthpv type 16en_US
dc.subjectcervical canceren_US
dc.subjectpolymerase chain reactionen_US
dc.titleDetection of Human Papillomavirus Type 16 in Invasive Cervical Cancer by Polymerase Chain Reactionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MS)en_US
Appears in Collections:Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
sathya_pushpa_1989Dec_masters.pdf
Open Access
17.75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue