Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/24102
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJoseph, Ameil-
dc.contributor.authorCaron, Beshele-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-21T17:52:17Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-21T17:52:17Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/24102-
dc.description.abstractRaven Sinclair (2004) locates the social worker at the heart of the colonial project, carrying out violent and assimilative government policy in Canada (p.50). Social work's connections to colonialism have been consciously and some would say “innocently” mutually dependent (Rossiter, 2001; Heron, 2007). Social work responses over time have been criticized for being non-performative (Ahmed, 2004), upholding institutional power (Bunjun, 2014) and ignoring ongoing colonialism (Lawrence & Dua, 2005). This study explores how self-identified white social work managers and directors reflect on and understand their roles in relation to reconciliation policy. It looks at the way discourse interrupts or maintains ruling relations including white supremacy and other colonial continuities (Heron, 2007). “In order to avoid further complicity, in assimilative and colonial practices, non-indigenous helpers must develop a clear understanding of their privilege and of their professions’ complicity in past and present colonial practices embedded in their practice”(Baskin, 2016). Through qualitative interviewing the study used critical whiteness studies and critical discourse analysis with the concept of relational validity in mind (Tuck & Yang, 2018). “What is valid in research is that which resonates with people’s lives and informs their power to make change” (Tuck & Yang, 2018, p.xiii). The findings suggest that participants orientation to reconciliation in the workplace, is controlled and continually reinforced through state discourses (neoliberal, neocolonial, reconciliation). Interestingly, the findings also suggest that participants may be de-contextualizing AOP discourses to neutralize and depoliticize their professional roles in the colonial project, as well as to rationalize their reluctance to take action. This suggests current approaches are not adequate to address colonial continuities in an era of reconciliation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectsocial worken_US
dc.subjectreconciliationen_US
dc.subjectnation-buildingen_US
dc.subjectharm reductionen_US
dc.subjectretreatismen_US
dc.subjectsettler subjectivityen_US
dc.subjectgatekeepingen_US
dc.subjectcritical whiteness studiesen_US
dc.subjectCanadaen_US
dc.subjectcolonial projecten_US
dc.subjectcolonial continuitiesen_US
dc.subjectwhite supremacyen_US
dc.titleColonial continuities and nation-building within social work practice and a demand for critical whiteness studiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSocial Worken_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Social Work (MSW)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Caron_Beshele_E_finalsubmission_Sept2018_MSWThesis.pdf
Open Access
715.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue