Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23974
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWoolhouse, Matthew-
dc.contributor.authorSpyra, Joanna-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-08T20:50:27Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-08T20:50:27Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/23974-
dc.descriptionIncludes an exploration of working memory models from a musical standpoint.en_US
dc.description.abstractA musical key can only be retained in memory for approximately 20 seconds. However, other factors may be influencing the strength of this retention. The current study tests the influence of time and number of events (chords) in an intervening key on the deterioration in memory of a nonadjacent key. Stimuli first established a major key using traditional harmonic rules, then modulated to an intervening key that was either 6 or 9 seconds in duration and formed from either 4 or 6 chords. Stimuli then returned to the original key in a probe cadence. Participants were asked to rate this cadence in terms of its sense of closure. It was revealed that there is a significant negative effect of time on the probe cadence though no effect of number of events was found. This suggests that spending more time in an intervening key, and not the number of intervening chords, diminishes the memory of the original key. However, it is unclear from this study where in memory the nonadjacent key relationship is processed. Relevant literature is examined to form a working hypothesis with the goal of strengthening future studies with a capable foundation in memory research and theories.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectmusic theoryen_US
dc.subjectmusic cognitionen_US
dc.subjectmemoryen_US
dc.subjectnonadjacencyen_US
dc.subjectnonadjacent key relationshipen_US
dc.subjecttimeen_US
dc.subjectnumber of eventsen_US
dc.subjecttonal perceptionen_US
dc.subjecttonal loopen_US
dc.subjectworking memoryen_US
dc.subjectmodulationen_US
dc.subjectprobe cadenceen_US
dc.titleThe Effects of Time and Events on the Perception of Nonadjacent Key Relationshipsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractWe have a very short memory span for musical keys. Humans can only remember a key for approximately 20 seconds after it’s changed. However, it is unclear whether it is time spent away from the key that makes us forget or if it is the number of chords we heard in a second, interrupting key. The current study tests this distinction using nonadjacent key relationships—in which a key is established, a different key interrupts for a random amount of time and number of chords before returning to the original key for two target chords. Results confirmed previous findings as there was a significant effect of time on memory. However, there was no effect of number of chords, suggesting that it is the length of time spent away from a key, not number of chords that has an effect on memory.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
spyra_joanna_m_201710_msc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2019-03-30
768.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue