Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23928
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Feit, Harvey A. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-21T01:49:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-21T01:49:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Feit, Harvey A. 2018. “Dispossession with Possession, Governance with Colonialism: Algonquian Hunting Territories and Anthropology as Engaged Practice.” Anthropologica 60: 149-160. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-5459 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23928 | - |
dc.description | This article can be found at: https://www.utpjournals.press/eprintstqUng75jKnqpFrfdUcR/pdf The link to this article was provided by University of Toronto Press Journals, 2019/02/13. In preparing this text I have benefited from advice and assistance offered over various phases of this research by Philip Awashish, Mélanie Chaplier, Jasmin Habib, Eleanor Leacock, Richard F. Salisbury, Colin H. Scott, George W. Stocking Jr., Adrian Tanner and Bruce G. Trigger. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Hunting territories have been and remain central to struggles of northern Algonquian peoples for governance of their lands, to the changes they envision, and for the responses they make when others enter their lands. Hunting territories are also envisioned by some nation-state governments and resource developers as means to disrupt Indigenous governance, communities and tenures to facilitate colonial regimes of control. What happened in this region, and how it came to be understood, has been part of the development of broad anthropological understandings of how peoples can continue living and actively governing their lands amidst colonial intrusions and relations. The anthropology of Algonquian hunting territories has throughout the last century been closely linked to several theoretical debates and to diverse anti-colonial analyses, both within and outside the discipline. Anthropologists’ work has involved ever-changing relationships with northern Algonquian peoples and with the beyond colonising movements, challenges and agreements they have initiated. These relationships have involved long-term anthropological engagements and practices that continue to be taken up in debates about anthropological scholarship and activism. The articles in this volume substantially update these northern Algonquian–state–market–anthropology relations and the analyses of Algonquian hunting territories. - - Les territoires de chasse ont été et demeurent centraux aux lutes des Peuples Algonquiens du Nord pour la gouvernance de leur territoire et dans les accommodements qu’ils envisagent et prennent avec ceux qui entrent sur leurs territoires. Les territoires de chasse sont aussi pensés par certains gouvernements d’États-nations et exploitants de ressources naturelles tel un moyen de déstabiliser la gouvernance Autochtone, les communautés et leurs pratiques foncières afin de faciliter les régimes de contrôle coloniaux. Ce qui s’est passé dans cette région, et la manière dont les choses ont été comprises, a fait partie du développement du savoir anthropologique quant à la manière dont les peuples continuent de vivre sur leurs territoires et de les gouverner, malgré les intrusions et les relations coloniales. Au cours du siècle dernier, l’anthropologie des territoires de chasse Algonquiens a suivi de près divers débats théoriques, se liant à divers arguments anticoloniaux, tant au sein de la discipline qu’à l’extérieur. Les travaux des anthropologues révèlent la transformation continuelle de leurs relations avec les Peuples Algonquiens du Nord, et avec les mouvements, revendications et arrangements de décolonisation initiés. Ces relations ont impliqué l’établissement d’engagements et de pratiques anthropologiques sur le long terme, lesquels continuent de faire l’objet de débats quant à la recherche et l’activisme anthropologiques. Les articles de ce numéro spécial actualisent ses relations entre les Algonquiens du Nord, l’état et l’anthropogie, et les analyses des territoires de chasse Algonquiens. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Killam Canada Council Post-doctoral Fellowship and research grants, Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee), Arts Research Board of McMaster University. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Anthropologica | en_US |
dc.subject | Governance | en_US |
dc.subject | Colonialism | en_US |
dc.subject | Hunting territories | en_US |
dc.subject | Dispossesion | en_US |
dc.subject | Way of life | en_US |
dc.subject | History of Anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject | Engaged Anthropology | en_US |
dc.subject | Land Rights | en_US |
dc.subject | Indigenous Peoples | en_US |
dc.subject | James Bay Cree | en_US |
dc.title | Dispossession with Possession, Governance with Colonialism: Algonquian Hunting Territories and Anthropology as Engaged Practice. | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Anthropology | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Anthropology Publications |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
FEIT_Dispossession_with_Possession-Anthropologica_60(1)_2018_LINK.pdf | 48.36 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.