Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Social Sciences
  4. Department of Anthropology
  5. Anthropology Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeit, Harvey A.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-18T15:58:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-18T15:58:36Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationFeit, Harvey A. 1998. “Self-Management and Government Management of Wildlife: Prospects for Coordination in James Bay and Canada.” In Culture: The Missing Element in Conservation and Development. R.J. Hoage and Katy Moran, eds. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing and the National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution. Pp. 95-111.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn0-7872-4761-8-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/23914-
dc.descriptionI have benefited from discussions with Cree administrators and colleagues involved in implementing and reviewing the James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement. I would like to specially thank Philip Awashish, Thomas Berger, Fikret Berkes, Taylor Brelsford, Lorraine Brooke, Brian Craik, Thomas Coon, Rick Cuciurean, Billy Diamond, Peter Hutchins, William Kemp, Abel Kitchen, Steve Langdon, Ignatius LaRusic, James O'Reilly, Alan Penn, Richard Preston, Richard Salisbury, Colin Scott, Adrian Tanner, Peter Usher, Martin Weinstein, and Paul Wilkinson.en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the most important debates in conservation today centers on whether effective linkages can be developed between indigenous systems of wildlife management and those instituted by government authorities. Such linkages must deal with the fact that both parties claim and exercise relative autonomy yet are also, in many respects, mutually dependent on each other. However simple this may sound, all conservationists trying to work with awareness of the connections between the systems of conservation must confront complex issues, ranging from recognizing the knowledge and practices of other cultures to assertions of aboriginal rights and nation-state rights to manage wildlife. Many of these issues have come to light over the past few decades in northern Québec in the relationships between the James Bay Cree and the governments of Québec and Canada.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Arts Research Board of McMaster University.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKendall/Hunt Publishing and the National Zoological Park, Smithsonian Institution.en_US
dc.subjectWildlife Conservationen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous Rightsen_US
dc.subjectIndigenous Knowledgeen_US
dc.subjectLocal Managementen_US
dc.subjectJames Bay Creeen_US
dc.subjectQuébecen_US
dc.titleSelf-Management and Government Management of Wildlife: Prospects for Coordination in James Bay and Canada.en_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnthropologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Anthropology Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FEIT_Self-Mgmt_Govt-Mgmt-Hoage_ed_1998.pdf
Open Access
606.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue