Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23761
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGoldreich, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorProdribaba, Nina-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-16T15:52:24Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-16T15:52:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/23761-
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, computational neuroscientists have suggested that human behaviour, including perception, occurs in a manner consistent with Bayesian inference. According to the Bayesian ideal observer model, the observer combines cues from multiple sensory streams as a weighted average based on each cue’s reliability. Most cue-combination research has focused on integration of cues between sensory modalities or within the visual modality. Cue combination within the tactile modality has been relatively rarely studied, and it is still not known whether cues from individual digits combine optimally. In this thesis, we use the ideal observer model to determine whether cues from three different digits are combined optimally. We predicted that cues from multiple digits would be combined according to the optimal cue combination model. To test our hypothesis, we devised a two-interval forced choice (2IFC) task where participants had to discriminate the distal/proximal location of a 1-mm thick edge across the fingerpad(s) of the index (D2), middle (D3), and ring (D4) fingers. We used a Bayesian adaptive method, the ψ method, to compute participants’ psychometric functions for single-digit (D2, D3, and D4) and multiple-digit (D23, D24, D34, and D234) conditions. We determined the stimulus level ∆x, the distance (mm) between the distal and proximal stimuli locations, at 76% correct probability. This distance corresponds to a sensitivity index d'=1 and is the σ value of the participant’s stimulus measurement distribution. We then used the single-digit σ values to predict optimal cue combination for the multiple-digits combinations. We did not observer optimal cue-combination between the digits in this study. We outline potential implications the results of this experimental have on determining how the nervous system combines cues between digits, focusing on theoretical and experimental updates to the experiment that might result in the observation of optimal cue combination between digits.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectpsychophysicsen_US
dc.subjectBayesian inferenceen_US
dc.subjectoptimal cue combinationen_US
dc.subjecttactile perceptionen_US
dc.subjectmultiple-digitsen_US
dc.subjectthresholden_US
dc.subjectsensory integrationen_US
dc.subjectideal observeren_US
dc.titleAN INVESTIGATION OF MULTIPLE-DIGIT CUE COMBINATION: PSYCHOPHYSICS AND BAYESIAN MODELINGen_US
dc.title.alternativeMULTIPLE-DIGIT CUE COMBINATIONen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNeuroscienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prodribaba_Nina_201809_MSc.pdf
Open Access
1.48 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue