Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Social Sciences
  4. Department of Anthropology
  5. Anthropology Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23555
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFeit, Harvey A.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-19T04:56:18Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-19T04:56:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationFeit, Harvey A. 2004. “Contested Identities of ‘Indians’ and ‘Whitemen’ at James Bay, or the Power of Reason, Hybridity and Agency.” In Senri Ethnological Studies (Osaka) 66: 109-126.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0387-6004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/23555-
dc.descriptionThis article is online as an Open Access resource at the National Museum of Ethnography Repository (Osaka). The repository is at https://minpaku.ac.jp/english/research/sharing . The article is at: https://minpaku.repo.nii.ac.jp/index.php?action=pages_view_main&active_action=repository_view_main_item_snippet&index_id=255&pn=1&count=20&order=7&lang=japanese&page_id=13&block_id=21 .en_US
dc.description.abstractIn "We Have Never Been Modern" Bruno Latour notes the connections, separations and the "hybridity" of colonial uses of discourses and practices of modernity (Latour 1993). In this paper I examine discourses about identities and practical relationships that develop between institutions of a modern national state society and an Indigenous people. I suggest that the modern state/developer and James Bay Cree claims about each other's identities, their efforts to differentiate identities, and their relational practices, implicate them in both explicit and implicit recognition of complex differences, similarities, hybridity and agency. Yet there are numerous ways that this happens. The distinctions and similarities often are closely linked to the way that moralities locate and legitimate an active subject.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Japanese Ministry of Education Joint Research Program, National Museum of Ethnography (Osaka), Northern Studies Association (Sapporo), McMaster University Arts Research Board.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSenri Ethnological Studies (Osaka)en_US
dc.subjectIdentitiesen_US
dc.subjectDifference-
dc.subjectRelationships-
dc.subjectHybridity-
dc.subjectPower-
dc.subjectReason-
dc.subjectLaw-
dc.subjectJames Bay Crees-
dc.subjectQuebec-
dc.titleContested Identities of ‘Indians’ and ‘Whitemen’ at James Bay, or the Power of Reason, Hybridity and Agencyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnthropologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Anthropology Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FEIT_Contested Identities-Senri_66_(Osaka)_2004.pdf
Open Access
931.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue