Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/23493
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRichardson, Dr. J.-
dc.contributor.advisorLott, Dr. J.N.A.-
dc.contributor.authorLeech, Thelma-
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-03T15:05:01Z-
dc.date.available2018-11-03T15:05:01Z-
dc.date.issued2000-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/23493-
dc.description.abstractThe laboratory curriculum and assessment of the course Biology 2D03, The Plant Kingdom, was revised in 1998. In part, the revision was due to the need to update the laboratory manual to, reflect a new edition of the text book. Also revision to condense three chapters into two to accommodate a shorter than usual term and to include a chapter on the fungi was done. Assessment was revised in response to student suggestions and comments taken from course assessments. Key to these revisions was incorporating Multiple Intelligence theory into curriculum and assessment. A new form of assessment, mini-laboratory practicals, was devised replacing quizzes and one laboratory examination. The mini-laboratory practicals utilized visual-spatial, bodilykinesthetic, naturalist intelligence, verbal-linguistic and mathematical-logical intelligences. Intrapersonal intelligence was implemented with an essay assignment which required students to reflect on how plants were important to their personal lives. Musical-rhythmic intelligence was implemented by playing classical music with nature sounds (to enhance the naturalist intelligence) in the laboratory classroom. Two laboratory sections requested that the music be played during test situations while six sections did not. There were few unintended side effects of the revisions. The essay was more of a feminine exercise and male students had difficulty in relating personal experience. Revision of assessment procedures did not affect grade means or distributions. Assessment methods required some memorization but also required thinking and application of knowledge. A large proportion of students found that the combination of assessment methods (mini-laboratory practicals, laboratory examination and final examination) best tested their knowledge. The majority suggested that the new revision scheme be retained. The use of classical music with nature sounds resulted in a more relaxing, soothing learning environment but there was no evidence of a "Mozart effect".en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectmultiple intelligence theoryen_US
dc.subjectbiology 2d03en_US
dc.titleMultiple Intelligence Theory in the Revision of Biology 2D03 Laboratoriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeMultiple Intelligence Theory in Biology 2D03 Laboratoriesen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (Teaching)en_US
Appears in Collections:Digitized Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
leech_thelma_gs_2000aug_masters.pdf.pdf
Open Access
5.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue