Group 2 Innate Lymphoid Cells are Increased in Patients with Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

Abstract

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by chronic pruritic relapsing eczematous lesions of the skin. Eosinophilic inflammation in AD is driven by activation of type 2 inflammatory cells including CD4+ T cells and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s). We have shown that type 2 cytokines, namely interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-13, stimulate migration and terminal differentiation of eosinophil progenitor cells (EoPs). We propose that these cytokines are important drivers of tissue eosinophilia in AD lesional skin. This study aimed to quantify, by flow cytometry, cells that produce type 2 cytokines in lesional skin compared to peripheral blood from moderate-severe AD patients. Methods: In a cross-sectional study of patients with moderate-to-severe AD (n=16), type 2 inflammatory cells were enumerated in blood and cells extracted from excised skin biopsies. By flow cytometry, live, singlet CD45+cells were identified as ILC2 (lin-CD127+CD294+), EoP (CD34+125+), and CD4+ T cells (Lin+CD3+CD4+). Intracellular expression of type 2 cytokines (IL-5 and IL-13) were evaluated in each cell population. In addition, we developed a protocol to enumerate ILC2s by fluorescence immune-histochemistry in lesional versus non-lesional skin samples and skin biopsies taken 24h post-intradermal challenge with allergen versus diluent. Data are expressed as median (interquartile range [IQR]) unless otherwise stated. Cross compartmental comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and where applicable, correlational analyses were performed using a Spearman’s rank-correlational test. Results: There was a significantly higher number of total ILC2s in lesional skin compared to blood from AD subjects (556 [99 – 5501] vs 235 [67 – 569] cells/mL, p=0.03). Similarly, IL-5+, IL-13+ ILC2s, were significantly greater in skin compared to blood (6 [1 – 666] vs 1 [1 – 19] cells/mL, p=0.03; 28 [1 – 1357] vs 1 [1 – 7] cells/mL, p=0.01, respectively). We found higher numbers of total and type 2 cytokine positive EoP in lesional skin biopsies from AD patients compared to blood (Total EoP: 815 [285 – 2794] vs 112 [46 – 247] cells/mL, p<0.01; IL-5+EoP: 36 [1 – 129] vs 1 [1 – 23] cells/mL, p=0.07; IL-13+EoP: 92 [10 – 182] vs 1 [1 – 8] cells/mL, p<0.01 and IL-5+IL-13+ILC2: 70 [1 – 158] vs 1 [1 – 12] cells/mL, p=0.02, respectively). In contrast, significantly higher numbers of total and type 2 cytokine positive CD4+ cells were found in blood compared to lesional skin biopsies from AD patients (Total CD4+: 1092 [650 – 1742] vs 58.3 [35.3– 152.4] x 103 cells/mL, p<0.01 and IL-5+IL-13+CD4+ cells: 13.5 x 103 [2.1 x 103 – 42.9 x 103] vs 3.8 x 103 [1.6 x 103 – 4.9 x 103] cells/mL, p=0.02, respectively). For IF staining, there was a significant higher number of ILC2s in lesional compared to non-lesional skin biopsies and biopsies taken 24h post allergen- compared to diluent challenge (1 [0 – 2] vs 0 [0 - 0] cells/mm2, p=0.008, and 2 [1 – 2] vs 0 [0 – 0] cells/mm2, p=0.0002, respectively). Interestingly, in sex analyses we found significantly greater levels of blood ILC2 in females compared to males, but this not was found in the skin. Importantly, we found a significant correlation between lesional skin levels of ILC2 measured by flow cytometry and clinical measures of disease severity/symptoms as reported/calculated from the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure questionnaire (POEM) score (total ILC2: r=0.55, p=0.04; IL-13+ ILC2s, r=0.61, p=0.02 and IL-5+ IL-13+ ILC2s: r=0.75, p=0.002). Conclusions: Preferential increases in skin-resident ILC2 that produce a type 2 rich environment were found in AD subjects. These levels correlated with patient-oriented measure of disease severity. We propose that this increase may encourage recruitment of mature eosinophils and EoP and possibly drive localized differentiation of EoP into mature eosinophils that may drive the pathology of AD lesions. Furthermore, immunofluorescence staining may be a suitable alternative to flow cytometry for identification of ILC2 in the event of a low cell count. These techniques can be used in future studies that target ILC2 biology to fully understand the role of these cells in driving AD.