Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/22118
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDEZA, ANTOINE-
dc.contributor.authorLIANG, HONGFENG-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-11T16:05:53Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-11T16:05:53Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/22118-
dc.description.abstractWe study a periodic review assemble-to-order (ATO) system introduced by Akcay and Xu (2004) which jointly optimizes the base stock levels and the component allocation with an independent base stock policy and a first-come- first-served allocation rule. The formulation is a non-smooth and thus theoretically and computationally challenging. In their computational experiments, Akcay and Xu (2004) modified the right hand side of the inventory availability constraints by substituting linear functions for piece-wise linear ones. This modification may have a significant impact on low budget levels. The optimal solutions obtained via the original formulation, i.e., the formulation without modification, include zero base stock levels for some components and thus indicate a bias against component commonality. We study the impact of component commonality on periodic review ATO systems. We show that lowering component commonality may yield a higher type-II service level. The lower degree of component commonality is achieved via separating inventories of the same component for different products. We substantiate this property via computational and theoretical approaches. We show that for low budget levels the use of separate inventories of the same component for different products can achieve a higher reward than with shared inventories. Finally, considering a simple ATO system with one component shared by two products, we characterize the budget ranges such that either separate or shared inventory component (i.e., component commonality) is beneficial.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAssemble-To-Orderen_US
dc.subjectcomponent commonalityen_US
dc.subjectstochastic programmingen_US
dc.subjectinventory replenishmenten_US
dc.subjectcomponent allocationen_US
dc.titleNOVEL STOCHASTIC PROGRAMMING FORMULATIONS FOR ASSEMBLE-TO-ORDER SYSTEMSen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentComputing and Softwareen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LIANG_HONGFENG__201709_PhD.pdf
Open Access
PhD thesis639.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue