Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Departments and Schools
  3. Faculty of Engineering
  4. Department of Chemical Engineering
  5. Chemical Engineering Publications
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/21851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdams, Thomas II-
dc.contributor.authorHoseinzade, Leila-
dc.contributor.authorMadabhushi, Pranav Bhaswanth-
dc.contributor.authorOkeke, Ikenna J.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-15T09:46:03Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-15T09:46:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017-08-14-
dc.identifier.citationAdams II, T.A.; Hoseinzade, L.; Madabhushi, P.B.; Okeke, I.J. Comparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Study. Processes 2017, 5, 44.en_US
dc.identifier.other10.3390/pr5030044-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/21851-
dc.descriptionOpen access articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThis work is a meta-study of CO2 capture processes for coal and natural gas power generation, including technologies such as post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture, the integrated gasification combined cycle process, oxyfuel combustion, membrane-based carbon capture processes, and solid oxide fuel cells. A literature survey of recent techno-economic studies was conducted, compiling relevant data on costs, efficiencies, and other performance metrics. The data were then converted in a consistent fashion to a common standard (such as a consistent net power output, country of construction, currency, base year of operation, and captured CO2 pressure) such that a meaningful and direct comparison of technologies can be made. The processes were compared against a standard status quo power plant without carbon capture to compute metrics such as cost of CO2 emissions avoided to identify the most promising designs and technologies to use for CO2 emissions abatement.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded in part by an NSERC Discovery grant (RGPIN-2016-06310), an Ontario Early Researcher Award (ER13-09-213), and an Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Grant (ORF-RE-05-072).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectCO2 captureen_US
dc.subjectpost-combustion captureen_US
dc.subjectpre-combustion captureen_US
dc.subjectIGCCen_US
dc.subjectoxyfuelsen_US
dc.subjectchemical looping combustionen_US
dc.subjectsolid oxide fuel cellsen_US
dc.subjectCO2 membranesen_US
dc.titleComparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentChemical Engineeringen_US
Appears in Collections:Chemical Engineering Publications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Adams Hoseinzade Madabhushi Okeke 2017 - Comp CCS Approaches for fossil based pow gen - Rev Meta Study.pdf
Open Access
2.07 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue