Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Research Centres and Institutes
  3. Centre for Advanced Research in Experimental and Applied Linguistics (ARiEAL)
  4. Representative Publications from ARiEAL
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/21816
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKuperman, Victor-
dc.contributor.authorEstes, Zachary-
dc.contributor.authorBrysbaert, Marc-
dc.contributor.authorWarriner, Amy Beth-
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-04T17:52:55Z-
dc.date.available2017-08-04T17:52:55Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-
dc.identifier.citationKuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669en_US
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/21816-
dc.description.abstractEmotion influences most aspects of cognition and behavior, but emotional factors are conspicuously absent from current models of word recognition. The influence of emotion on word recognition has mostly been reported in prior studies on the automatic vigilance for negative stimuli, but the precise nature of this relationship is unclear. Various models of automatic vigilance have claimed that the effect of valence on response times is categorical, an inverted U, or interactive with arousal. In the present study, we used a sample of 12,658 words and included many lexical and semantic control factors to determine the precise nature of the effects of arousal and valence on word recognition. Converging empirical patterns observed in word-level and trial-level data from lexical decision and naming indicate that valence and arousal exert independent monotonic effects: Negative words are recognized more slowly than positive words, and arousing words are recognized more slowly than calming words. Valence explained about 2% of the variance in word recognition latencies, whereas the effect of arousal was smaller. Valence and arousal do not interact, but both interact with word frequency, such that valence and arousal exert larger effects among low-frequency words than among high-frequency words. These results necessitate a new model of affective word processing whereby the degree of negativity monotonically and independently predicts the speed of responding. This research also demonstrates that incorporating emotional factors, especially valence, improves the performance of models of word recognition.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_US
dc.subjectArousal and valenceen_US
dc.subjectAutomatic vigilanceen_US
dc.subjectEmotionen_US
dc.subjectLexical decision and namingen_US
dc.subjectWord recognitionen_US
dc.titleEmotion and Language: Valence and Arousal Affect Word Recognitionen_US
dc.typePostprinten_US
dc.contributor.departmentNoneen_US
Appears in Collections:Representative Publications from ARiEAL

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kuperman et al, 2014, Journal of Experimental Psychology.pdf
Open Access
Kuperman et al, 2014 (Research Article)1.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue