Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/21050
Title: | CLINICAL DECISION MAKING IN PARAMEDICINE |
Authors: | Eby, Michael |
Advisor: | Monteiro, Sandra |
Department: | Health Science Education |
Keywords: | Paramedicine;Clinical Decision Making;Expertise;Feedback;Practice Guidelines;Medical Directives;Diagnostic Accuracy;Ontario |
Abstract: | Title: Clinical Decision Making in Paramedicine Author(s) & affiliation(s): Michael Eby – McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Sandra Monteiro – McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Geoffrey Norman – McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Walter Tavares – McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada Background: Paramedics are frequently required to make rapid decisions in an uncontrolled, dynamic environment, often with limited diagnostic information. In Ontario, paramedic practice is based on a set of provincial medical directives that provide diagnostic and treatment criteria. Unsupervised deviation from these directives is classified as a form of error and highly discouraged. To date, there is little known about how years of clinical experience or level of certification affect the way these medical directives are used. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between paramedic experience, training and accuracy of treatment decisions when faced with patients who meet and fall outside of the existing medical directives. Methods: Thirty-one participants (16 experienced / 15 novice) were recruited from two paramedic services in Ontario. “Experienced” was defined as in-practice for 5 years or more. Participants were presented with 9 scenarios; in 6 scenarios, the patient presentation fit within the existing directives, while in 3 scenarios, the patient presentation fell outside the medical directives. Multiple-choice responses were used to capture participants’ decisions to treat or not treat the patients. Responses were scored and submitted to a mixed-factorial ANOVA to evaluate differences in accuracy between case types, years of experience and level of training. Results: There was a significant effect of case type (p < 0.004). Accuracy was lower when the patient presentation did not meet the criteria of the medical directive (76.34% (CI = 67.15% to 85.53%) vs. 98.35% (CI = 96.55% to 100%) when they did. There was no effect of years of clinical practice or level of certification. Conclusion: The results suggest both novice and experienced paramedics are able to accurately apply medical directives, however, there is a significant decrease in accuracy when the patient presentation does not fit one. This variation in practice may have a significant impact on patient safety, and further research is required to determine what factors may be causing this decreased accuracy. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/21050 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eby_Michael_J_2017-01_MSc.pdf | 6.51 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.