Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20959
Title: | Developing a better understanding of resource withdrawal from medical services through examination of its characteristics, government policies and an initiative |
Other Titles: | Resource withdrawal from medical services |
Authors: | Embrett, Mark |
Advisor: | Randall, Glen E |
Department: | Health Policy |
Keywords: | Health Policy;Resource Withdrawal;Qualitative Research;Decision Making;Government;Priority Setting;Problem Frames;Grounded Theory |
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Abstract: | Resource withdrawal from unnecessary medical services is an important issue as the cost of health care continues to rise. In many countries, resource withdrawal is primarily determined by government policies that remove, restrict, reduce, or limit the availability of publically insured medical services. Ideally, resource withdrawal is the result of a careful assessment of clinical and economic evidence regarding a service’s safety and effectiveness in order to ensure that it is the most efficient use of resources. Despite advocacy for a routinized and systematic approach to the withdrawal of resources from medical services, research has indicated that political and social factors often influence government, resulting in decisions that are neither consistent nor transparent. In this dissertation I seek to understand factors that may influence resource withdrawal decisions in an attempt to promote a more routinized and systematic approach. In order to understand the resource withdrawal landscape and provide greater conceptual clarity, the first study in this dissertation identifies and explores its characteristics (antecedents, attributes, and outcomes). Definitions of two prominent terms, disinvestment, and rationing are proposed. In the second study, a qualitative analysis of two examples of resource withdrawal reveals how the characteristics of problem frames affect the shape and timing of government resource withdrawal policies. Findings support the proposition that the complexity of the story told within the problem frame affects the shape of the policy; while visibility affects the timing. In the third study, I analyzed the perspectives of key informants about the Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) campaign, which has the aim of reducing unnecessary services by encouraging a discussion between physician and patient. Findings reveal that CWC was designed to address pressures from government, patients, and the public. However, CWC was not designed in a way that is expected to address the underlying reasons unnecessary services are provided, including limited time in the clinical encounter, patient demands, uncertainty in the care pathway, and physician fear of litigation. Results from all three studies help establish a common language, identify influences on government led resource withdrawal and reasons why CWC is unlikely to reduce unnecessary services. Together this thesis provides insights into some of the factors affecting resource withdrawal from medical services, and findings may be used to help assess ways to improve the formulation of resource withdrawal policies. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20959 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Embrett PhD Thesis Dec 21.pdf | 2.21 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.