Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20770
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHarris, Jocelyn E.-
dc.contributor.authorKusec, Andrea-
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-03T14:52:42Z-
dc.date.available2016-11-03T14:52:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/20770-
dc.description.abstractIndividuals with and acquired brain injury (ABI) often experience low motivation to engage in rehabilitation. However, measures of motivation and engagement in ABI populations are scarce. Currently, four such measures exist: the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self (BMQ-S), the Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q), the BMQ-Relative (BMQ-R), and the Rehabilitation Therapy Engagement Scale (RTES), but are without sufficient psychometric investigations and lack a theoretical framework. The purpose of this thesis was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the BMQ-S, MOT-Q, BMQ-R, and RTES in adults with an ABI, and to discuss how motivation theory can inform assessment of motivation in ABI. Thirty-nine adult ABI participants and 20 clinicians were recruited from an ABI rehabilitation program. Patient participants completed the BMQ-S, the MOT-Q, and self-rated measures of insight, apathy, depression, and anxiety. Clinician participants completed the BMQ-R, the RTES, and clinician-rated measures of insight and apathy. The MOT-Q and the BMQ-S had excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The MOT-Q correlated with insight, while the BMQ-S correlated with apathy, depression, anxiety, and insight. The MOT-Q and the BMQ-S did not correlate with each other. The RTES and BMQ-R had excellent internal consistency and good inter-rater reliability. The RTES and the BMQ-R correlated with apathy and insight, and with each other. In light of the result that the BMQ-S and the MOT-Q did not correlate, it was determined that each measure may represent equally important but distinct aspects of motivation. By drawing upon Self-determination Theory, it was concluded that the BMQ-S and the MOT-Q may represent intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, respectively, and that utilizing both can provide a more comprehensive understanding of what factors are influencing a patient’s level of motivation to engage.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectacquired brain injuryen_US
dc.subjectmeasurementen_US
dc.subjectmotivationen_US
dc.subjectengagementen_US
dc.titleMeasures of Motivation and Engagement in Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Psychometric Properties and Theoretical Perspectivesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.description.layabstractLow motivation to engage in rehabilitation is a common problem in acquired brain injury (ABI) populations. Four current measures of patient and clinician-rated motivation and engagement designed for ABI exist: the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Motivation Questionnaire-Self (BMQ-S), the Motivation for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Questionnaire (MOT-Q), the BMQ-Relative (BMQ-R), and the Rehabilitation Therapy Engagement Scale (RTES). However, these measures have insufficient investigations into whether they accurately measure motivation, and lack a theoretical framework as a basis of assessment. The goal of this thesis was to determine the reliability and validity of four motivation and engagement measures in an ABI population, and discuss the role of motivation theory in improving assessment of motivation in ABI. The results of this thesis suggest that all measures have good to excellent reliability and validity, and that the BMQ-S and the MOT-Q may represent distinct but equally important aspects of motivation in ABI.en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kusec_Andrea_A_FinalSubmission201610_MSc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2017-10-31
1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue