Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20597
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Joseph, Ameil | - |
dc.contributor.author | Adjekum, Sarah Aberafi | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-10-05T18:35:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-10-05T18:35:07Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-11-17 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/20597 | - |
dc.description | SARAH ADJEKUM B.A., B.S.W. A Research Project Submitted to the School of Social Work in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Social Work McMaster University 2016 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | As observed with the ongoing migrant crises, media coverage of refugee and asylum seekers connects the concepts of mental health and trauma to their experiences. The resulting discourse around refugees pathologizes the refugee identity and simultaneously obscures the violence that necessitates their departure from their home countries. As refugee discourse incorporates discourses of mental health, it also legitimizes nation state’s practice social control towards these populations through detention. As the utilization of technologies of securitization is normalized, detention has become increasingly accepted as a response to humanitarian crises. Past research on detention has consistently demonstrated the harmful effects it has on children, adults, and especially individuals with symptoms of mental illness. In particular, research drawing on trauma and mental health discourse has been effective in bringing attention to the counterproductive outcomes of detention. This paper is concerned with the employment of discourses of mental health and trauma by mainstream media as they pertain to the treatment of migrants in detention in Canada. It explores the media’s role in the re(creation) of refugee discourse and purveyors of racial ideology that problematizes people of colour and demands state intervention in the form of mental health aid. Using critical discourse analysis, it contrasted mainstream media coverage of four major publications on detention. This study finds prevalent use of mental health discourse and little mention of violence in several online publications. It also finds that recommendations made in the articles emphasized micro and mezzo focused changes that are unable to challenge federal policy that enables securitization. Nor is it capable of addressing the forms of violence inherent to the mental health system. As such, this paper makes recommendations for a critical examination of refugee and immigration policy that takes into account the states’ participation in the creation of refugee crises. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | refugees | en_US |
dc.subject | moral panic | en_US |
dc.subject | mental health | en_US |
dc.subject | media | en_US |
dc.subject | critical discourse | en_US |
dc.subject | deterrence | en_US |
dc.title | Violence by Any Other Name: Exploring the Use of Moral Panic in the Pathologization of Refugees Using Critical Discourse Analysis | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Violence by Any Other Name | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Social Work | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Social Work (MSW) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjekum_Sarah_A_FinalSubmissionSept2016_MSW.pdf | 610.4 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.