Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19626
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Harris, Richard | - |
dc.contributor.author | Maradin, Karen | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-06-23T14:27:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-06-23T14:27:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1990-04 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19626 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p> The patterns of working class settlement for New York City were established using occupation statistics found within the 1940 census. The health areas of the city's boroughs were shaded based on location quotients. Location quotients were calculated for craftsmen, operatives and labourers individually and then as a group, defining the term "total working class". The urban structure of New York City, presented in the four maps of working class settlement, failed to show the existence of five distinct concentric areas which Burgess identified in Chicago in 1925. The complicated topography, peripheral location of manufacturing industries, and lack of evenly dispersed transportation modes and bridges have contributed to the unique arrangement of settlement in New York City. </p> | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | New York | en_US |
dc.subject | working class | en_US |
dc.subject | settlement | en_US |
dc.subject | 1940 | en_US |
dc.subject | concentric zone | en_US |
dc.title | A Comparison of New York City's Working Class Settlement in 1940 To Burgess' Concentric Zone Theory | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Geography | en_US |
dc.description.degreetype | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Bachelor of Arts (BA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Bachelor theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Maradin_Karen_A_1990Apr_Geo4C6.pdf | 3.35 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.