Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/19576
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorJordana, Manel-
dc.contributor.authorMandur, Talveer-
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-17T15:34:16Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-17T15:34:16Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/19576-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There is growing evidence indicating that skin can be an initiating site for allergic sensitization to peanut. Additionally, anaphylaxis can also be mediated by IgG1 and macrophages, known as the alternative pathway. In this setting, the allergen binds to serum IgG1 forming immune complexes which can bind to macrophages, basophils and neutrophils and cause the release of anaphylactic mediators. METHODS: The model of epicutaneous sensitization used in this study relied on tape stripping the skin followed by direct application of peanut. Knockout mice and/or antibody neutralization studies were used to characterize anaphylaxis in this model. For the in vitro experiments, we used either peritoneal or bone marrow derived macrophages. We also collected samples from mice undergoing anaphylaxis at different time points to measure mediators involved. RESULTS: We found that anaphylaxis in this model of epicutaneous sensitization was dependent on IgG1, macrophages and PAF but not IgE, mast cells, basophils, neutrophils, monocytes and histamine. Additionally, IL-1α was critically required for anaphylaxis. Interestingly, this role was intracellular as both anti-IL-1α treatment and a deficiency in IL-1R failed to prevent anaphylaxis. Using macrophage cultures, we found that the activity of cPLA2, the enzyme responsible for PAF production, was intact in the absence of IL-1α. Likewise, the activity of PAF-AH, the enzyme that degrades PAF, was also unaffected in IL-1α-/- mice. We also showed that PAF signalling was intact in IL-1α-/- mice. Lastly, we showed that MDR1, the transporter for PAF was not critical for anaphylaxis in this model. CONCLUSION: We developed a model of skin sensitization in which anaphylaxis was driven by IgG1, macrophages and PAF. We identified intracellular IL-1α as a critical component of the alternative pathway of anaphylaxis. We also showed that this effect is not related to defects in PAF metabolism or signalling. This allows us to direct the focus on other pathways affected by IL-1α in our future studies.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleROLE OF IL-1α IN IgG1 MEDIATED ANAPHYLAXISen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMedical Sciences (Molecular Virology and Immunology Program)en_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mandur_Talveer_201606_MSc.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2017-06-01
1.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue