Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/16489
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSchunemann, Holger-
dc.contributor.authorSantesso, Nancy-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T16:36:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-01T16:36:33Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/16489-
dc.description.abstractPeople are seeking health information from a wide variety of sources. The comprehensive information in clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) represents an excellent source of evidence based information which should be communicated to this audience. Currently, there is little research about how to write a version of a CPG that would be easily accessible to people and more information is needed to identify barriers and supports, and potential solutions to disseminate CPGs to this audience (i.e. patients and the public). This thesis represents a body of research consisting of four scientific papers with an overarching objective to understand and explore how CPGs and recommendations primarily developed and written for health care professionals can be disseminated to patients and the public. A CPG was developed using the rigorous methods of the GRADE approach; a randomised controlled trial was conducted to evaluate a format to disseminate synthesised evidence to patients and the public; a systematic review of the literature with a thematic and narrative synthesis of patient and public attitudes towards and awareness of CPGs was performed; and a qualitative description and content analysis of a sample of patients versions of CPGs was conducted. The studies found that people are interested in patient versions of CPGs for a variety of purposes, such as for decision making, as a tool to prepare for consultations with health care providers, and as advice for self-care management. However, barriers to their use may include lack of personalisation of information, negative attitudes towards guidelines as ways to restrict and control access to care, and lack of understanding of the recommendations and the evidence. A format to disseminate the evidence from a guideline is proposed, but future research should focus on strategies to personalise the information, to overcome the negative attitudes towards guidelines, and to communicate the recommendations and the evidence informing the recommendations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectclinical practice guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectdisseminationen_US
dc.subjectpatientsen_US
dc.subjectpublicen_US
dc.titleDissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines to Patients and the Publicen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentClinical Epidemiology/Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatisticsen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Santessothesissubmitted.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2016-09-20
thesis1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue