Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/16401
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPotvin, James-
dc.contributor.advisorKeir, Peter-
dc.contributor.advisorLyons, Jim-
dc.contributor.authorLiebregts, Julian H.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-18T20:17:38Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-18T20:17:38Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/16401-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: External support behaviours, which include leaning (supporting with the non-task hand) or bracing (supporting with the body), are frequently employed by workers in manufacturing settings. However, current ergonomic assessment tools are limited by our limited understanding of these behaviours. Recent studies have investigated these behaviours, however, the designs of these studies are limited in their applicability to real-world scenarios. The purpose of this study was to assess how different task parameters affect the prediction of external support behaviours, as well as the effect of support on task hand, and body, kinematics and kinetics, in a minimally constrained experimental design. Methods: Female participants (n = 18) performed a series of one-handed maximal exertions (in the six orthogonal directions), and one precision task, in four hand Locations. Trials either featured support (as chosen by the participant), or no support. Results & Discussion: Three logistic regression models were developed, with inputs from individual and task characteristics, and they correctly predicted the occurrence of leaning, bracing, or simultaneous leaning and bracing, 74-86% of the time. Leaning and/or bracing were found to provide: 1) oppositional forces to increase task hand force generation, 2) balance, by countering destabilizing moments about the feet, and 3) a reduction in moment arm of the task hand force, with respect to the upper body joints, by bringing the shoulder closer to the task hand. Participants were able to exert 64.8% more force at the task hand as a result of support. Leaning hand placement depended on the task force direction and location. However, the positioning of the leaning hand varied very little. Finally, the precision condition showed that fine motor demands may also affect external support choice.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectexternal supporten_US
dc.subjectkinesiologyen_US
dc.subjectergonomicsen_US
dc.subjectoccupational biomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectconstrained reachingen_US
dc.subjectposture predictionen_US
dc.subjectleaningen_US
dc.subjectbracingen_US
dc.subjectmanual arm strengthen_US
dc.subjectdigital human modellingen_US
dc.subjectone-handed exertionsen_US
dc.subjectprecision tasksen_US
dc.titleAn Investigation of External Support Choices and Behaviours During One-Handed Exertions with Constrained Reachesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Kinesiologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Liebregts - 2014 - AN INVESTIGATION OF EXTERNAL SUPPORT CHOICES AND BEHAVIOURS DURING ONE-HANDED EXERTIONS.pdf
Open Access
7.55 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue